Errbit vs Airbrake

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Errbit icon
Errbit
Airbrake icon
Airbrake

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Errbit and Airbrake? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Errbit is a Development solution with tags like opensource, selfhosted, ruby, rails, airbrake, exceptional.

It boasts features such as Error tracking and aggregation, Error grouping, Error notifications via email, Campfire, HipChat, Flowdock, etc, Source code parsing and display, GitHub integration, User authentication, Deployment tracking and pros including Open source and self-hosted, Easy to deploy and configure, Integrates with various notification channels, Good GitHub integration, Can be customized and extended.

On the other hand, Airbrake is a Development product tagged with error-tracking, exception-handling, debugging, monitoring.

Its standout features include Real-time error monitoring, Alerting and reporting, Automatic exception reporting, Error tracking across software stack, Helps identify and resolve issues quickly, and it shines with pros like Fast error detection and debugging, Improves application stability, Integrates with many platforms and languages, Good for monitoring production apps, Detailed error data and stack traces.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Errbit and Airbrake?

When evaluating Errbit versus Airbrake, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Errbit and Airbrake have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include opensource, selfhosted, ruby.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Errbit and Airbrake significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include opensource, selfhosted, ruby, rails.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include opensource, selfhosted and error-tracking, exception-handling.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Errbit and Airbrake. You might also explore opensource, selfhosted, ruby for alternative approaches.

Feature Errbit Airbrake
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Errbit
Errbit

Description: Errbit is an open source error catcher that provides error tracking for your web apps. It is designed to be self-hosted and easy to deploy, similar to Open Source projects like Airbrake and Exceptional.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Airbrake
Airbrake

Description: Airbrake is an error monitoring and debugging software for web applications. It provides real-time error tracking across the entire software stack, alerting, reporting and automatic exception reporting to help developers identify and resolve issues quickly.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Errbit
Errbit Features
  • Error tracking and aggregation
  • Error grouping
  • Error notifications via email, Campfire, HipChat, Flowdock, etc
  • Source code parsing and display
  • GitHub integration
  • User authentication
  • Deployment tracking
Airbrake
Airbrake Features
  • Real-time error monitoring
  • Alerting and reporting
  • Automatic exception reporting
  • Error tracking across software stack
  • Helps identify and resolve issues quickly

Pros & Cons Analysis

Errbit
Errbit
Pros
  • Open source and self-hosted
  • Easy to deploy and configure
  • Integrates with various notification channels
  • Good GitHub integration
  • Can be customized and extended
Cons
  • Lacks some advanced features of paid solutions
  • Requires more technical expertise to deploy and manage
  • Limited reporting capabilities
  • Not ideal for large development teams
Airbrake
Airbrake
Pros
  • Fast error detection and debugging
  • Improves application stability
  • Integrates with many platforms and languages
  • Good for monitoring production apps
  • Detailed error data and stack traces
Cons
  • Can get expensive for large apps
  • Setup and configuration can be complex
  • May detect false positives
  • Large volume of data to sift through
  • Lacks customization options

Pricing Comparison

Errbit
Errbit
  • Open Source
Airbrake
Airbrake
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs