Ext JS vs FooTable

Struggling to choose between Ext JS and FooTable? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Ext JS is a Development solution with tags like ui, data-grids, charts, forms.

It boasts features such as MVC architecture, Responsive design, Data binding, Theming and styling, Charts and graphs, Form validation, Drag and drop, AJAX loading and submission, Component based UI and pros including Cross-browser compatibility, Large set of UI components, Good documentation, Active community support, Enterprise-level support available.

On the other hand, FooTable is a Office & Productivity product tagged with jquery, responsive, tables, mobile.

Its standout features include Responsive design, Column toggling, Sorting, Filtering, Pagination, Theming, Extensions, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and easy to implement, Works with existing HTML tables, Good documentation and examples, Active development and support, Customizable and extensible.

Feature	Ext JS	FooTable
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Office & Productivity

Product Overview

Ext JS

Description: Ext JS is a JavaScript framework for building data-intensive, cross-platform web applications for any modern device. It includes a comprehensive set of high-performance and customizable UI widgets.

FooTable

Description: FooTable is a lightweight jQuery plugin that allows you to make HTML tables responsive, enabling them to be easily viewable and navigated on different screen sizes, including mobile devices. It works by dynamically hiding columns from the table and adding search and pagination functionality.

Key Features Comparison

Ext JS Features

• MVC architecture
• Responsive design
• Data binding
• Theming and styling
• Charts and graphs
• Form validation
• Drag and drop
• AJAX loading and submission
• Component based UI

FooTable Features

• Responsive design
• Column toggling
• Sorting
• Filtering
• Pagination
• Theming
• Extensions

Pros & Cons Analysis

Ext JS

Pros

• Cross-browser compatibility
• Large set of UI components
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Enterprise-level support available

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Can be difficult to customize
• Not ideal for simple websites
• Commercial license is expensive

FooTable

Pros

• Lightweight and easy to implement
• Works with existing HTML tables
• Good documentation and examples
• Active development and support
• Customizable and extensible

Cons

• Less features than some table plugins
• May require extra CSS for complex layouts
• Older IE browser support lacking

Pricing Comparison

Ext JS

• Open Source
• Commercial License

FooTable

• Open Source