FieldPulse vs Kickserv

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

FieldPulse

Kickserv

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between FieldPulse and Kickserv? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

FieldPulse is a Business & Commerce solution with tags like scheduling, dispatching, customer-history, metrics-tracking.

It boasts features such as Job scheduling and dispatch, Customer database, Invoicing, Estimates and quotes, Time tracking, Inventory management, Equipment tracking, Reporting and analytics and pros including User-friendly interface, Mobile access for field technicians, Integration with QuickBooks, Automated reminders and notifications, Customizable fields and forms, Reasonable pricing.

On the other hand, Kickserv is a Business & Commerce product tagged with ticket-management, knowledge-base, live-chat.

Its standout features include Ticket management, Knowledge base, Live chat, Open API, Email piping, Canned responses, SLA policies, Help desk reports, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to set up and use, Good basic feature set, Integrates with many apps, Self-hosted.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare FieldPulse and Kickserv?

When evaluating FieldPulse versus Kickserv, both solutions serve different needs within the business & commerce ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

FieldPulse and Kickserv have established themselves in the business & commerce market. Key areas include scheduling, dispatching, customer-history.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between FieldPulse and Kickserv significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include scheduling, dispatching, customer-history, metrics-tracking.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include scheduling, dispatching and ticket-management, knowledge-base.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between FieldPulse and Kickserv. You might also explore scheduling, dispatching, customer-history for alternative approaches.

Feature	FieldPulse	Kickserv
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Business & Commerce	Business & Commerce
Target Users	Developers, QA Engineers	QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment	Self-hosted, Cloud	Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve	Moderate to Steep	Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

FieldPulse

Description: FieldPulse is a field service management software designed for small and mid-sized contractors and service companies. It allows dispatchers to efficiently schedule jobs, technicians to access customer information and history while in the field, and business owners to track key metrics.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Kickserv

Description: Kickserv is an open-source customer support software designed for small businesses. It provides ticket management, knowledge base, and live chat features to help companies support their customers.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

FieldPulse Features

Job scheduling and dispatch
Customer database
Invoicing
Estimates and quotes
Time tracking
Inventory management
Equipment tracking
Reporting and analytics

Kickserv Features

Ticket management
Knowledge base
Live chat
Open API
Email piping
Canned responses
SLA policies
Help desk reports

Pros & Cons Analysis

FieldPulse

Pros

User-friendly interface
Mobile access for field technicians
Integration with QuickBooks
Automated reminders and notifications
Customizable fields and forms
Reasonable pricing

Cons

Limited customization options
No native accounting features
Third-party integrations can be buggy
Support could be more responsive
Mobile app lacks some functionality

Kickserv

Pros

Free and open source
Easy to set up and use
Good basic feature set
Integrates with many apps
Self-hosted

Cons

Limited customization
No advanced reporting
No phone support
Limited user roles and permissions

Pricing Comparison

FieldPulse

Subscription-Based
Custom Pricing

Kickserv

Open Source

Get More Information

FieldPulse

Learn More About FieldPulse

Kickserv

Learn More About Kickserv

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software

Back to Homepage

FieldPulse vs Kickserv

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Why Compare FieldPulse and Kickserv?

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Technical Architecture & Implementation

Integration & Ecosystem

Decision Framework

Product Overview

Key Features Comparison

Pros & Cons Analysis

Pros

Cons

Pros

Cons

Pricing Comparison

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Company

Explore

Resources