Fig Terminal vs iTerm2

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Fig Terminal icon
Fig Terminal
iTerm2 icon
iTerm2

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Fig Terminal and iTerm2? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Fig Terminal is a Development solution with tags like terminal, emulator, ssh, aesthetics.

It boasts features such as GPU-accelerated text rendering, Multiple tabs and splits, Customizable themes, SSH and serial device connectivity, Autocomplete and macros and pros including Beautiful and smooth text rendering, Very customizable appearance, Good terminal emulation and SSH client, Lightweight and fast.

On the other hand, iTerm2 is a Os & Utilities product tagged with terminal, emulator, macos, opensource.

Its standout features include Split panes, Search, Autocorrect, Mouseless copy/paste, Profiles and themes, and it shines with pros like More features than built-in Terminal, Open source, Customizable and extensible.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Fig Terminal and iTerm2?

When evaluating Fig Terminal versus iTerm2, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Fig Terminal and iTerm2 have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include terminal, emulator, ssh.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Fig Terminal and iTerm2 significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include terminal, emulator, ssh, aesthetics.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include terminal, emulator and terminal, emulator.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Fig Terminal and iTerm2. You might also explore terminal, emulator, ssh for alternative approaches.

Feature Fig Terminal iTerm2
Overall Score N/A 1
Primary Category Development Os & Utilities
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Fig Terminal
Fig Terminal

Description: Fig is a Terminal emulator that focuses on aesthetics and functionality. It features GPU-based text rendering for crystal clear fonts, flexible theming options with premade themes available, tabs and splits for managing multiple terminal sessions, SSH and serial device connectivity, and other handy terminal features.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

iTerm2
iTerm2

Description: iTerm2 is a popular open-source terminal emulator for macOS. It has more features than the built-in Terminal app, like split panes, search, autocorrect, mouseless copy/paste, profiles and themes, and more.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Fig Terminal
Fig Terminal Features
  • GPU-accelerated text rendering
  • Multiple tabs and splits
  • Customizable themes
  • SSH and serial device connectivity
  • Autocomplete and macros
iTerm2
iTerm2 Features
  • Split panes
  • Search
  • Autocorrect
  • Mouseless copy/paste
  • Profiles and themes

Pros & Cons Analysis

Fig Terminal
Fig Terminal
Pros
  • Beautiful and smooth text rendering
  • Very customizable appearance
  • Good terminal emulation and SSH client
  • Lightweight and fast
Cons
  • Limited built-in functionality compared to full IDEs
  • No remote development features
  • Only available on MacOS and Linux
iTerm2
iTerm2
Pros
  • More features than built-in Terminal
  • Open source
  • Customizable and extensible
Cons
  • Steeper learning curve than Terminal
  • More resource intensive
  • Less stable than Terminal

Pricing Comparison

Fig Terminal
Fig Terminal
  • Free
  • Open Source
iTerm2
iTerm2
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Fig Terminal
Fig Terminal
Fig Terminal
Learn More About Fig Terminal
iTerm2
iTerm2
iTerm2
Learn More About iTerm2

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Find your fit.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal