Flasm vs NASM

Struggling to choose between Flasm and NASM? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Flasm is a Development solution with tags like assembler, compiler, decompiler, assembly-language.

It boasts features such as Supports multiple CPU architectures like x86, ARM, MIPS, PowerPC, SPARC, Can compile assembly code to executable binaries, Can decompile executable binaries back to assembly code, Open source and cross-platform - works on Windows, Linux, macOS, Has both GUI and command line interfaces, Integrated debugger, Supports macros and conditional assembly, Can optimize compiled code, Generates assembly listing files and pros including Free and open source, Supports many CPU architectures, Can both compile and decompile, Cross-platform, Easy to use GUI, Has an integrated debugger.

On the other hand, NASM is a Development product tagged with assembler, x86, open-source.

Its standout features include Supports x86 and x86-64 instruction sets, Can generate output in multiple object file formats like ELF, COFF, Mach-O, etc, Supports macros for code reuse, Has built-in optimizations, Integrates with various linkers and debuggers, Cross-platform - runs on Windows, Linux, BSD, macOS, Open source with active community support, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Fast and lightweight, Supports latest x86 instructions, Portable across platforms, Integrates well with build tools, Lots of documentation and examples available.

Feature	Flasm	NASM
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Flasm

Description: Flasm is a free, open source assembly language compiler and decompiler. It supports assembly code for multiple CPU architectures and can compile to executable binaries or DLLs. Flasm is cross-platform and runs on Windows, Linux, and macOS.

NASM

Description: NASM (Netwide Assembler) is an open-source assembler for the x86 processor architecture. It supports a range of object file formats and can be used to write 16-bit, 32-bit, and 64-bit applications for Windows, Linux, BSD, and macOS.

Key Features Comparison

Flasm Features

• Supports multiple CPU architectures like x86, ARM, MIPS, PowerPC, SPARC
• Can compile assembly code to executable binaries
• Can decompile executable binaries back to assembly code
• Open source and cross-platform - works on Windows, Linux, macOS
• Has both GUI and command line interfaces
• Integrated debugger
• Supports macros and conditional assembly
• Can optimize compiled code
• Generates assembly listing files

NASM Features

• Supports x86 and x86-64 instruction sets
• Can generate output in multiple object file formats like ELF, COFF, Mach-O, etc
• Supports macros for code reuse
• Has built-in optimizations
• Integrates with various linkers and debuggers
• Cross-platform - runs on Windows, Linux, BSD, macOS
• Open source with active community support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Flasm

Pros

• Free and open source
• Supports many CPU architectures
• Can both compile and decompile
• Cross-platform
• Easy to use GUI
• Has an integrated debugger

Cons

• Limited to assembly language only
• Not as full featured as some commercial compilers
• Documentation could be more extensive
• GUI could use some polish
• Decompiler results not always perfect

NASM

Pros

• Free and open source
• Fast and lightweight
• Supports latest x86 instructions
• Portable across platforms
• Integrates well with build tools
• Lots of documentation and examples available

Cons

• Steep learning curve for beginners
• Lacks high-level features like C compilers
• Manual register allocation required
• Not as full-featured as commercial assemblers

Pricing Comparison

Flasm

• Free
• Open Source

NASM

• Open Source