FlatRedBall vs Phaser

Struggling to choose between FlatRedBall and Phaser? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

FlatRedBall is a Games solution with tags like 2d, game-engine, open-source, crossplatform, editor.

It boasts features such as 2D game engine and editor, Cross-platform game development, Handles graphics, audio, input, physics, and more, Open source, Designed for easy 2D game creation and pros including Open source and free to use, Supports cross-platform development, Provides a wide range of built-in features, Active community and documentation.

On the other hand, Phaser is a Games product tagged with html5, javascript, game-engine, 2d-games.

Its standout features include WebGL and Canvas rendering, Built-in physics engine, Asset loading, Input handling, Cameras, Particles, Time-stepped updates, Scenes and transitions, and it shines with pros like Open source, Good documentation, Large community, Active development, Permissive license, Good performance.

Feature	FlatRedBall	Phaser
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Games	Games

Product Overview

FlatRedBall

Description: FlatRedBall is an open source 2D game engine and editor. It is designed for easily creating 2D games that can run cross-platform on multiple devices. The engine handles graphics, audio, input, physics, and more out of the box.

Phaser

Description: Phaser is a fast, free, and fun open source HTML5 game framework. It offers WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Phaser is ideal for making 2D games like platformers, top-down shooters, puzzle games, and more.

Key Features Comparison

FlatRedBall Features

• 2D game engine and editor
• Cross-platform game development
• Handles graphics, audio, input, physics, and more
• Open source
• Designed for easy 2D game creation

Phaser Features

• WebGL and Canvas rendering
• Built-in physics engine
• Asset loading
• Input handling
• Cameras
• Particles
• Time-stepped updates
• Scenes and transitions

Pros & Cons Analysis

FlatRedBall

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Supports cross-platform development
• Provides a wide range of built-in features
• Active community and documentation

Cons

• Primarily focused on 2D games
• May have a steeper learning curve for beginners
• Limited support for advanced 3D features

Phaser

Pros

• Open source
• Good documentation
• Large community
• Active development
• Permissive license
• Good performance

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Not ideal for complex 3D games
• Limited UI components
• No built-in networking

Pricing Comparison

FlatRedBall

• Open Source

Phaser

• Open Source