Flumotion vs MediaGoblin

Struggling to choose between Flumotion and MediaGoblin? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Flumotion is a Video & Movies solution with tags like streaming, video, live, adaptive, rtsp, rtp.

It boasts features such as Live and on-demand streaming, Supports common streaming protocols like RTP, RTSP, HTTP, Adaptive streaming for delivering video at different bitrates, Modular architecture, Built-in monitoring and management console, Supports adding third-party components, Distributed deployment and pros including Open source and free, Flexible and modular architecture, Good streaming performance, Built-in monitoring and management, Supports distributed deployment.

On the other hand, MediaGoblin is a Social & Communications product tagged with photos, videos, audio, documents, decentralized, selfhosted.

Its standout features include Decentralized media publishing and sharing, Support for images, audio, video and documents, User accounts and permissions, Tagging and collections, Theming and customization, Federation between MediaGoblin instances, Extensible plugin architecture, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, User owns and controls their data, Avoid censorship and takedowns, Customizable and extensible, Active development community.

Feature	Flumotion	MediaGoblin
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Video & Movies	Social & Communications

Product Overview

Flumotion

Description: Flumotion is an open source streaming media server software that can stream live or on-demand video over the internet. It supports streaming protocols like RTP and RTSP and allows for adaptive streaming to deliver video content at different bitrates.

MediaGoblin

Description: MediaGoblin is a free, open source media publishing platform that lets anyone host their own server to share photos, videos, audio, and documents. It aims to decentralize media sharing and publishing.

Key Features Comparison

Flumotion Features

• Live and on-demand streaming
• Supports common streaming protocols like RTP, RTSP, HTTP
• Adaptive streaming for delivering video at different bitrates
• Modular architecture
• Built-in monitoring and management console
• Supports adding third-party components
• Distributed deployment

MediaGoblin Features

• Decentralized media publishing and sharing
• Support for images, audio, video and documents
• User accounts and permissions
• Tagging and collections
• Theming and customization
• Federation between MediaGoblin instances
• Extensible plugin architecture

Pros & Cons Analysis

Flumotion

Pros

• Open source and free
• Flexible and modular architecture
• Good streaming performance
• Built-in monitoring and management
• Supports distributed deployment

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Steep learning curve
• Not very beginner friendly
• Limited community support

MediaGoblin

Pros

• Open source and free
• User owns and controls their data
• Avoid censorship and takedowns
• Customizable and extensible
• Active development community

Cons

• Requires self-hosting
• Limited adoption so far
• Less features than mainstream platforms
• Can be difficult to install and manage

Pricing Comparison

Flumotion

• Open Source

MediaGoblin

• Open Source