Fortran vs Julia

Struggling to choose between Fortran and Julia? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Fortran is a Development solution with tags like numeric-computing, scientific-computing, compiled, imperative.

It boasts features such as Compiled language for high performance computing, Strong typing and data abstraction capabilities, Built-in mathematical and array processing functions, Backward compatibility to support legacy code, Interoperability with C and other languages and pros including Fast execution speed, Efficient code for numerical and scientific applications, Mature language with large user base and code libraries, Portable across platforms, Can call C functions directly.

On the other hand, Julia is a Development product tagged with scientific-computing, data-science, high-performance, dynamic-typing.

Its standout features include High-level dynamic programming language, Designed for high-performance numerical analysis and computational science, Open source with a package ecosystem, Just-in-time (JIT) compiler that gives it fast performance, Good for parallel computing and distributed computing, Integrates well with Python and C/C++ code, and it shines with pros like Very fast performance compared to Python and R, Easy to learn for Python/R users, Open source with large package ecosystem, Good for numerical computing and data science, Multi-paradigm (procedural, functional, object-oriented), Interactive REPL environment.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Fortran

Fortran

Fortran is a general-purpose, compiled imperative programming language that is especially suited to numeric computation and scientific computing. Originally developed by IBM in the 1950s for scientific and engineering applications, Fortran came to dominate this area of programming early on and has been in continuous use for over half a century.

Categories:
numeric-computing scientific-computing compiled imperative

Fortran Features

  1. Compiled language for high performance computing
  2. Strong typing and data abstraction capabilities
  3. Built-in mathematical and array processing functions
  4. Backward compatibility to support legacy code
  5. Interoperability with C and other languages

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free Compilers

Pros

Fast execution speed

Efficient code for numerical and scientific applications

Mature language with large user base and code libraries

Portable across platforms

Can call C functions directly

Cons

Steep learning curve for new programmers

Verbose syntax compared to modern languages

Limited object-oriented capabilities

Lack of strings and dynamic data structures

Mostly used in legacy and scientific code, less demand in new development


Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance, dynamic programming language designed for scientific computing and data science. It combines the programming productivity of Python and R with the speed and performance of C and Fortran.

Categories:
scientific-computing data-science high-performance dynamic-typing

Julia Features

  1. High-level dynamic programming language
  2. Designed for high-performance numerical analysis and computational science
  3. Open source with a package ecosystem
  4. Just-in-time (JIT) compiler that gives it fast performance
  5. Good for parallel computing and distributed computing
  6. Integrates well with Python and C/C++ code

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Very fast performance compared to Python and R

Easy to learn for Python/R users

Open source with large package ecosystem

Good for numerical computing and data science

Multi-paradigm (procedural, functional, object-oriented)

Interactive REPL environment

Cons

Smaller user community than Python/R

Less extensive libraries than Python/R

Not as widely used in industry as Python/R yet