Skip to content

FreeBASIC vs Makeself

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs.

FreeBASIC icon
FreeBASIC
Makeself icon
Makeself

FreeBASIC vs Makeself: The Verdict

⚡ Summary:

FreeBASIC: FreeBASIC is an open-source, free BASIC compiler for Windows, Linux, and macOS. It is compatible with QBasic/QuickBASIC and allows developers to easily create console, graphical GUI, and web applications. FreeBASIC supports modern features like object-oriented programming.

Makeself: Makeself is a small shell script that generates a self-extractable tarball for Unix. It packages software into a single executable file for easy distribution and installation.

Both tools serve their respective audiences. Compare the features, pricing, and user ratings above to determine which best fits your needs.

Last updated: May 2026 · Comparison by Sugggest Editorial Team

Feature FreeBASIC Makeself
Sugggest Score — —
Category Development Os & Utilities
Pricing Open Source Open Source

Product Overview

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC

Description: FreeBASIC is an open-source, free BASIC compiler for Windows, Linux, and macOS. It is compatible with QBasic/QuickBASIC and allows developers to easily create console, graphical GUI, and web applications. FreeBASIC supports modern features like object-oriented programming.

Type: software

Pricing: Open Source

Makeself
Makeself

Description: Makeself is a small shell script that generates a self-extractable tarball for Unix. It packages software into a single executable file for easy distribution and installation.

Type: software

Pricing: Open Source

Key Features Comparison

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC Features
  • Supports procedural and object-oriented programming
  • Syntax similar to QBasic/QuickBASIC
  • Can create console, GUI and web applications
  • Has bindings for GTK+, SDL, OpenGL, Allegro, etc
  • Can interface with C libraries
  • Supports multi-platform compilation for Windows, Linux and macOS
Makeself
Makeself Features
  • Creates self-extracting shell scripts
  • Packages software into a single executable file
  • Works on Unix-like systems
  • Easy distribution and installation of software
  • Compression using gzip, bzip2, lzma or xz
  • MD5 checksum verification
  • Progress bar during extraction
  • Customizable messages, prompts and license agreement

Pros & Cons Analysis

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC

Pros

  • Free and open source
  • Easy to learn for beginners
  • Fast compilation
  • Produces small and efficient executables
  • Large community support

Cons

  • Not as full-featured as commercial BASIC dialects
  • Limited IDE and debugging support
  • Documentation can be lacking in some areas
Makeself
Makeself

Pros

  • Simple and easy to use
  • Good for distributing software
  • Does not require root access or special permissions
  • Works across different Unix distributions
  • Lightweight and efficient

Cons

  • Limited to Unix-like systems
  • Not as full-featured as other packaging systems
  • No dependency handling
  • No uninstall capability
  • Lacks some advanced features

Pricing Comparison

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC
  • Open Source
Makeself
Makeself
  • Open Source

Related Comparisons

InstallShield
vs FreeBASIC vs Makeself

Learn More About Each Product

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC
Reviews, pricing & alternatives →
Makeself
Makeself
Reviews, pricing & alternatives →

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

FreeBASIC Alternatives
Makeself Alternatives
Browse More Software