Froxlor vs Virtualmin

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Froxlor icon
Froxlor
Virtualmin icon
Virtualmin

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Froxlor and Virtualmin? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Froxlor is a Network & Admin solution with tags like web-interface, server-management, hosting, linux.

It boasts features such as Web-based control panel, Manage websites, DNS, email accounts, and more, Supports multiple hosting packages and resellers, Customizable user interfaces, Automated tasks and scripts, Backup and restore functionality, Detailed logging and reporting, Integrated FTP and SSH access and pros including Open source and free to use, Comprehensive server management features, User-friendly web interface, Highly customizable and extensible, Suitable for both shared hosting and server administrators.

On the other hand, Virtualmin is a Network & Admin product tagged with server-administration, web-hosting, control-panel.

Its standout features include Web hosting control panel, Domain management, Website management, Database management, Mail server management, Automated tasks, User and access control, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to use interface, Automates many hosting tasks, Supports multiple web servers like Apache, Nginx, Scalable for large deployments, Good community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Froxlor and Virtualmin?

When evaluating Froxlor versus Virtualmin, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Froxlor and Virtualmin have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include web-interface, server-management, hosting.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Froxlor and Virtualmin significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include web-interface, server-management, hosting, linux.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include web-interface, server-management and server-administration, web-hosting.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Froxlor and Virtualmin. You might also explore web-interface, server-management, hosting for alternative approaches.

Feature Froxlor Virtualmin
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Froxlor
Froxlor

Description: Froxlor is an open source server management panel for Linux systems. It allows you to easily manage websites, DNS, email accounts and more through a web interface. It is suitable for shared hosting providers and server administrators.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Virtualmin
Virtualmin

Description: Virtualmin is an open source web hosting control panel that simplifies server administration. It allows managing domains, websites, databases, mailboxes and more from a single interface.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Froxlor
Froxlor Features
  • Web-based control panel
  • Manage websites, DNS, email accounts, and more
  • Supports multiple hosting packages and resellers
  • Customizable user interfaces
  • Automated tasks and scripts
  • Backup and restore functionality
  • Detailed logging and reporting
  • Integrated FTP and SSH access
Virtualmin
Virtualmin Features
  • Web hosting control panel
  • Domain management
  • Website management
  • Database management
  • Mail server management
  • Automated tasks
  • User and access control

Pros & Cons Analysis

Froxlor
Froxlor
Pros
  • Open source and free to use
  • Comprehensive server management features
  • User-friendly web interface
  • Highly customizable and extensible
  • Suitable for both shared hosting and server administrators
Cons
  • Limited support for non-Linux operating systems
  • May have a steeper learning curve for beginners
  • Fewer pre-built integrations compared to some commercial alternatives
Virtualmin
Virtualmin
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Easy to use interface
  • Automates many hosting tasks
  • Supports multiple web servers like Apache, Nginx
  • Scalable for large deployments
  • Good community support
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited support options
  • Not ideal for large scale or complex deployments
  • Some features may be buggy or unreliable

Pricing Comparison

Froxlor
Froxlor
  • Open Source
Virtualmin
Virtualmin
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs