fSekrit vs iHave.to

Struggling to choose between fSekrit and iHave.to? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

fSekrit is a Business & Commerce solution with tags like opensource, selfhosted, data-visualization, reporting, data-warehousing.

It boasts features such as Data visualization, Ad-hoc reporting, Scheduled reporting, Alerting, Data warehousing, ETL tools, REST API, Plugin architecture and pros including Open source, Self-hosted, Customizable, Large community, Cost effective.

On the other hand, iHave.to is a Productivity product tagged with task-management, productivity, reminders, collaboration.

Its standout features include Task management, Productivity tracking, Task prioritization, Task categorization, Calendars, Reminders, Collaboration tools, App integrations, and it shines with pros like Intuitive interface, Flexible task management, Robust collaboration features, Seamless app integrations, Powerful productivity analytics.

Feature	fSekrit	iHave.to
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Business & Commerce	Productivity

Product Overview

fSekrit

Description: fSekrit is an open-source, self-hosted alternative to proprietary business intelligence and analytics platforms. It provides tools for data visualization, reporting, and data warehousing to help companies gain insights from their data.

iHave.to

Description: iHave.to is a task management and productivity software. It allows users to create tasks, set due dates, add notes and attachments, categorize and prioritize tasks. Key features include calendars, reminders, collaboration tools, and integrations with other apps.

Key Features Comparison

fSekrit Features

• Data visualization
• Ad-hoc reporting
• Scheduled reporting
• Alerting
• Data warehousing
• ETL tools
• REST API
• Plugin architecture

iHave.to Features

• Task management
• Productivity tracking
• Task prioritization
• Task categorization
• Calendars
• Reminders
• Collaboration tools
• App integrations

Pros & Cons Analysis

fSekrit

Pros

• Open source
• Self-hosted
• Customizable
• Large community
• Cost effective

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Requires technical expertise to set up and manage
• Limited support options

iHave.to

Pros

• Intuitive interface
• Flexible task management
• Robust collaboration features
• Seamless app integrations
• Powerful productivity analytics

Cons

• Can be overwhelming for new users
• Mobile app lacks some desktop features
• Collaboration requires paid plans
• Limitations with free version

Pricing Comparison

fSekrit

• Open Source

iHave.to

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based