Gambas vs LiveCode

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Gambas icon
Gambas
LiveCode icon
LiveCode

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Gambas and LiveCode? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Gambas is a Development solution with tags like basic, visual-editor, interpreter.

It boasts features such as Visual IDE, RAD tool, Component architecture, Interpreted BASIC dialect, GTK+ GUI, Database access, 2D game development and pros including Easy to learn syntax, Fast development, Cross-platform, Lightweight, Extensible via components.

On the other hand, LiveCode is a Development product tagged with crossplatform, mobile, desktop, web, rad.

Its standout features include Cross-platform development, Drag and drop interface builder, English-like programming language, Built-in database engine, Wide range of widgets and controls, APIs for access to device features, Can generate standalone executables, Open architecture and extensible, and it shines with pros like Rapid development and prototyping, Reduced time to market, Single codebase for multiple platforms, Intuitive programming language, Visual interface design, Active and supportive community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Gambas and LiveCode?

When evaluating Gambas versus LiveCode, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Gambas and LiveCode have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include basic, visual-editor, interpreter.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Gambas and LiveCode significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include basic, visual-editor, interpreter.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include basic, visual-editor and crossplatform, mobile.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Gambas and LiveCode. You might also explore basic, visual-editor, interpreter for alternative approaches.

Feature Gambas LiveCode
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Gambas
Gambas

Description: Gambas is an open source integrated development environment focused on the development of graphical applications using the BASIC programming language. It incorporates a visual editor, object browser, code editor, and interpreter

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

LiveCode
LiveCode

Description: LiveCode is a cross-platform rapid application development environment that allows creating apps for desktop, web, mobile and more. It uses an English-like programming language to simplify development.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Gambas
Gambas Features
  • Visual IDE
  • RAD tool
  • Component architecture
  • Interpreted BASIC dialect
  • GTK+ GUI
  • Database access
  • 2D game development
LiveCode
LiveCode Features
  • Cross-platform development
  • Drag and drop interface builder
  • English-like programming language
  • Built-in database engine
  • Wide range of widgets and controls
  • APIs for access to device features
  • Can generate standalone executables
  • Open architecture and extensible

Pros & Cons Analysis

Gambas
Gambas
Pros
  • Easy to learn syntax
  • Fast development
  • Cross-platform
  • Lightweight
  • Extensible via components
Cons
  • Limited adoption
  • Not as full-featured as commercial IDEs
  • BASIC language seen as outdated by some
LiveCode
LiveCode
Pros
  • Rapid development and prototyping
  • Reduced time to market
  • Single codebase for multiple platforms
  • Intuitive programming language
  • Visual interface design
  • Active and supportive community
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for beginners
  • Limited options for native look and feel
  • Not ideal for complex or demanding apps
  • Lacks some features of traditional IDEs
  • Documentation can be lacking

Pricing Comparison

Gambas
Gambas
  • Open Source
LiveCode
LiveCode
  • Free
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Gambas
Gambas
Gambas
Learn More About Gambas
LiveCode
LiveCode
LiveCode
Learn More About LiveCode

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Ditch the guesswork.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal