Gambas vs LiveCode

Struggling to choose between Gambas and LiveCode? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Gambas is a Development solution with tags like basic, visual-editor, interpreter.

It boasts features such as Visual IDE, RAD tool, Component architecture, Interpreted BASIC dialect, GTK+ GUI, Database access, 2D game development and pros including Easy to learn syntax, Fast development, Cross-platform, Lightweight, Extensible via components.

On the other hand, LiveCode is a Development product tagged with crossplatform, mobile, desktop, web, rad.

Its standout features include Cross-platform development, Drag and drop interface builder, English-like programming language, Built-in database engine, Wide range of widgets and controls, APIs for access to device features, Can generate standalone executables, Open architecture and extensible, and it shines with pros like Rapid development and prototyping, Reduced time to market, Single codebase for multiple platforms, Intuitive programming language, Visual interface design, Active and supportive community.

Feature	Gambas	LiveCode
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Gambas

Description: Gambas is an open source integrated development environment focused on the development of graphical applications using the BASIC programming language. It incorporates a visual editor, object browser, code editor, and interpreter

LiveCode

Description: LiveCode is a cross-platform rapid application development environment that allows creating apps for desktop, web, mobile and more. It uses an English-like programming language to simplify development.

Key Features Comparison

Gambas Features

• Visual IDE
• RAD tool
• Component architecture
• Interpreted BASIC dialect
• GTK+ GUI
• Database access
• 2D game development

LiveCode Features

• Cross-platform development
• Drag and drop interface builder
• English-like programming language
• Built-in database engine
• Wide range of widgets and controls
• APIs for access to device features
• Can generate standalone executables
• Open architecture and extensible

Pros & Cons Analysis

Gambas

Pros

• Easy to learn syntax
• Fast development
• Cross-platform
• Lightweight
• Extensible via components

Cons

• Limited adoption
• Not as full-featured as commercial IDEs
• BASIC language seen as outdated by some

LiveCode

Pros

• Rapid development and prototyping
• Reduced time to market
• Single codebase for multiple platforms
• Intuitive programming language
• Visual interface design
• Active and supportive community

Cons

• Steep learning curve for beginners
• Limited options for native look and feel
• Not ideal for complex or demanding apps
• Lacks some features of traditional IDEs
• Documentation can be lacking

Pricing Comparison

Gambas

• Open Source

LiveCode

• Free
• Subscription-Based