Gambas vs Xojo

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Gambas icon
Gambas
Xojo icon
Xojo

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Gambas and Xojo? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Gambas is a Development solution with tags like basic, visual-editor, interpreter.

It boasts features such as Visual IDE, RAD tool, Component architecture, Interpreted BASIC dialect, GTK+ GUI, Database access, 2D game development and pros including Easy to learn syntax, Fast development, Cross-platform, Lightweight, Extensible via components.

On the other hand, Xojo is a Development product tagged with crossplatform, desktop-apps, web-apps, ios-apps, raspberry-pi-apps, draganddrop-interface, basiclike-language, rapid-development.

Its standout features include Drag-and-drop interface, Cross-platform development, Basic-like programming language, Rapid app development, and it shines with pros like Easy to learn, Fast development cycle, Single codebase for multiple platforms.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Gambas and Xojo?

When evaluating Gambas versus Xojo, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Gambas and Xojo have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include basic, visual-editor, interpreter.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Gambas and Xojo significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include basic, visual-editor, interpreter.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include basic, visual-editor and crossplatform, desktop-apps.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Gambas and Xojo. You might also explore basic, visual-editor, interpreter for alternative approaches.

Feature Gambas Xojo
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Gambas
Gambas

Description: Gambas is an open source integrated development environment focused on the development of graphical applications using the BASIC programming language. It incorporates a visual editor, object browser, code editor, and interpreter

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Xojo
Xojo

Description: Xojo is a cross-platform integrated development environment (IDE) and programming language used to build native apps for desktop, web, iOS and Raspberry Pi. It uses a Basic-like programming language and allows developers to quickly build apps with a drag-and-drop interface, making it easy for beginners.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Gambas
Gambas Features
  • Visual IDE
  • RAD tool
  • Component architecture
  • Interpreted BASIC dialect
  • GTK+ GUI
  • Database access
  • 2D game development
Xojo
Xojo Features
  • Drag-and-drop interface
  • Cross-platform development
  • Basic-like programming language
  • Rapid app development

Pros & Cons Analysis

Gambas
Gambas
Pros
  • Easy to learn syntax
  • Fast development
  • Cross-platform
  • Lightweight
  • Extensible via components
Cons
  • Limited adoption
  • Not as full-featured as commercial IDEs
  • BASIC language seen as outdated by some
Xojo
Xojo
Pros
  • Easy to learn
  • Fast development cycle
  • Single codebase for multiple platforms
Cons
  • Limited platform support
  • Weak developer community
  • Expensive compared to other tools

Pricing Comparison

Gambas
Gambas
  • Open Source
Xojo
Xojo
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs