GlusterFS vs ScaleIO

Struggling to choose between GlusterFS and ScaleIO? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GlusterFS is a Network & Admin solution with tags like distributed, file-system, scalable, open-source.

It boasts features such as Distributed file system, Scale-out network-attached storage, File replication and distribution, Strong consistency, Parallel access, Geo-replication, Automatic load balancing and pros including High scalability, High availability, Good performance, Open source, Easy to use and manage, Works across physical locations.

On the other hand, ScaleIO is a System & Hardware product tagged with storage, virtualization, scalability, efficiency.

Its standout features include Software-defined storage, Creates virtualized storage pool from commodity hardware, Supports SSDs and HDDs in the same pool, Storage pooling across servers, Inline deduplication and compression, Thin provisioning, Automatic load balancing, Multi-site data replication, APIs for automation and orchestration, and it shines with pros like Lowers storage costs by using commodity hardware, Scales capacity and performance easily, Simplifies management with single virtual pool, Increases efficiency with deduplication/compression, Enables high availability across sites, Integrates with cloud and virtualization platforms.

Feature	GlusterFS	ScaleIO
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	System & Hardware

Product Overview

GlusterFS

Description: GlusterFS is an open source, distributed file system that can scale out to store petabytes of data. It aggregates disk storage across servers into a single global namespace.

ScaleIO

Description: ScaleIO is software designed for enterprise storage management and infrastructure optimization. It creates a virtualized storage pool by aggregating capacity across multiple storage devices. ScaleIO aims to increase scalability and efficiency.

Key Features Comparison

GlusterFS Features

• Distributed file system
• Scale-out network-attached storage
• File replication and distribution
• Strong consistency
• Parallel access
• Geo-replication
• Automatic load balancing

ScaleIO Features

• Software-defined storage
• Creates virtualized storage pool from commodity hardware
• Supports SSDs and HDDs in the same pool
• Storage pooling across servers
• Inline deduplication and compression
• Thin provisioning
• Automatic load balancing
• Multi-site data replication
• APIs for automation and orchestration

Pros & Cons Analysis

GlusterFS

Pros

• High scalability
• High availability
• Good performance
• Open source
• Easy to use and manage
• Works across physical locations

Cons

• Complex initial setup
• Steep learning curve
• No built-in user management
• Limited monitoring capabilities
• No native encryption

ScaleIO

Pros

• Lowers storage costs by using commodity hardware
• Scales capacity and performance easily
• Simplifies management with single virtual pool
• Increases efficiency with deduplication/compression
• Enables high availability across sites
• Integrates with cloud and virtualization platforms

Cons

• Proprietary solution, vendor lock-in
• Complex initial configuration
• Steep learning curve
• Limited ecosystem of supported hardware
• Requires minimum 3 node cluster
• Lacks comprehensive data services

Pricing Comparison

GlusterFS

• Open Source

ScaleIO

• Subscription-Based