GNU Savannah vs Bitbucket

Struggling to choose between GNU Savannah and Bitbucket? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GNU Savannah is a Development solution with tags like open-source, project-hosting, version-control, bug-tracking.

It boasts features such as Version control, Bug tracking, Communication tools, Release management, Web hosting for open source projects and pros including Free hosting for open source projects, Supports many popular version control systems like Git, SVN, CVS, etc, Integrated issue tracking and project management tools, Active community support and collaboration.

On the other hand, Bitbucket is a Development product tagged with git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

Its standout features include Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc, and it shines with pros like Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

Feature	GNU Savannah	Bitbucket
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

GNU Savannah

Description: GNU Savannah is a web-based software development platform maintained by the Free Software Foundation. It provides free hosting for open source projects, supporting version control, bug tracking, communication tools, and release management.

Bitbucket

Description: Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

Key Features Comparison

GNU Savannah Features

• Version control
• Bug tracking
• Communication tools
• Release management
• Web hosting for open source projects

Bitbucket Features

• Git and Mercurial version control
• Pull requests for code review
• Issue tracking
• Code search
• Wikis for documentation
• Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

Pros & Cons Analysis

GNU Savannah

Pros

• Free hosting for open source projects
• Supports many popular version control systems like Git, SVN, CVS, etc
• Integrated issue tracking and project management tools
• Active community support and collaboration

Cons

• Limited customization options compared to self-hosted solutions
• Can be slow at times due to shared infrastructure
• No built-in support for testing or CI/CD

Bitbucket

Pros

• Unlimited private repositories for small teams
• Great integration with other Atlassian products
• Powerful branch permissions and workflows
• Fast and reliable performance

Cons

• Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan
• Missing some features of GitHub like social coding
• Web interface not as polished as GitHub

Pricing Comparison

GNU Savannah

• Open Source

Bitbucket

• Free
• Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
• Premium ($6-21 per user/month)