Struggling to choose between GNU social and Pleroma? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
GNU social is a Social & Communications solution with tags like decentralized, open-source, privacy, twittercompatible.
It boasts features such as Decentralized social network, User data privacy and control, Open protocols and APIs, Interoperability with Twitter, Media embedding, Hashtags, Groups and lists, Notifications and pros including User data privacy, No central authority, Open source and transparent, Interoperable with other networks, Free to use.
On the other hand, Pleroma is a Social & Communications product tagged with fediverse, activitypub, social-network, open-source.
Its standout features include ActivityPub federation, Real-time chat, Media attachments, Hashtags, Follow/unfollow, Replies and mentions, Custom emojis, User profiles, Content warnings, and it shines with pros like Open source and self-hostable, Lightweight and fast, Decentralized, Customizable, No ads or algorithmic feeds.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
GNU social is a free and open source social networking platform. It is designed to be decentralized and enable users to control their own data instead of having it stored on corporate servers. It is compatible with Twitter to allow seamless communication across platforms.
Pleroma is an open-source social networking platform built on the ActivityPub protocol. It is designed to be lightweight, fast, and easy to self-host as an alternative to corporate social media platforms.