GoCD vs Bitten

Struggling to choose between GoCD and Bitten? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GoCD is a Development solution with tags like automation, continuous-delivery, continuous-integration, deployment, release-management.

It boasts features such as Automated build pipeline creation and management, Built-in support for common build tools like Maven, Gradle, Ant, Rake, SBT, MSBuild, Make, Exec, NAnt, Phing, etc, Parallel and sequential execution of tasks, Built-in artifact repository, Value stream map to visualize build workflow, Role based access control, Plugins for integration with other tools and pros including Open source and free to use, Highly customizable and extensible via plugins, Good documentation and community support, Integrates well with other DevOps tools, Scales well for large codebases and teams.

On the other hand, Bitten is a Development product tagged with test-management, automated-testing, open-source.

Its standout features include Test case management, Test scheduling, Test execution tracking, Test reporting and metrics, Integration with source control systems, Web-based interface, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Integrates with popular SCMs like Git, Mercurial, and Subversion, Web-based for easy access, Automated test tracking and metrics, Active development community.

Feature	GoCD	Bitten
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

GoCD

Description: GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server that helps automate the software release workflow. It provides visibility into builds, deployments, and testing environments to help teams release software faster and more reliably.

Bitten

Description: Bitten is an open source web-based test management system developed by Mozilla. It integrates with popular source code management systems to provide tracking, scheduling, and reporting of automated tests for software projects.

Key Features Comparison

GoCD Features

• Automated build pipeline creation and management
• Built-in support for common build tools like Maven, Gradle, Ant, Rake, SBT, MSBuild, Make, Exec, NAnt, Phing, etc
• Parallel and sequential execution of tasks
• Built-in artifact repository
• Value stream map to visualize build workflow
• Role based access control
• Plugins for integration with other tools

Bitten Features

• Test case management
• Test scheduling
• Test execution tracking
• Test reporting and metrics
• Integration with source control systems
• Web-based interface

Pros & Cons Analysis

GoCD

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Highly customizable and extensible via plugins
• Good documentation and community support
• Integrates well with other DevOps tools
• Scales well for large codebases and teams

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Setting up complex build pipelines can be tricky
• Lacks some advanced features found in paid alternatives
• Upgrades can be tricky due to breaking changes
• Limited native support for Windows environments

Bitten

Pros

• Open source and free
• Integrates with popular SCMs like Git, Mercurial, and Subversion
• Web-based for easy access
• Automated test tracking and metrics
• Active development community

Cons

• Limited adoption outside of Mozilla projects
• Setup and configuration can be complex
• Only supports Python-based tests
• No native mobile or desktop apps

Pricing Comparison

GoCD

• Open Source

Bitten

• Open Source