Google App Engine vs IBM Cloudant

Struggling to choose between Google App Engine and IBM Cloudant? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Google App Engine is a Development solution with tags like paas, cloud-computing, web-application-hosting.

It boasts features such as Automatic scaling, Load balancing, Distributed caching, Health checks, Integrated with other Google Cloud services and pros including Fully managed infrastructure, Pay only for what you use, Quick and easy setup, Scales automatically.

On the other hand, IBM Cloudant is a Online Services product tagged with nosql, document-database, cloud-database, json-database.

Its standout features include JSON document storage, Full text search, Geospatial queries, Replication and sync, Access control and encryption, Backups and recovery, Monitoring and analytics, and it shines with pros like Fully managed service, High availability, Scalable, Flexible data schema, Real-time sync, Robust query support, Enterprise security.

Feature	Google App Engine	IBM Cloudant
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Online Services

Product Overview

Google App Engine

Description: Google App Engine is a platform for building scalable web applications and mobile backends. It provides automatic scaling, distributed caching, health checks and other services to make app development easier.

IBM Cloudant

Description: IBM Cloudant is a fully managed NoSQL document database service built for modern web and mobile applications. It is optimized for handling heavy workloads of concurrent reads and writes in the cloud.

Key Features Comparison

Google App Engine Features

• Automatic scaling
• Load balancing
• Distributed caching
• Health checks
• Integrated with other Google Cloud services

IBM Cloudant Features

• JSON document storage
• Full text search
• Geospatial queries
• Replication and sync
• Access control and encryption
• Backups and recovery
• Monitoring and analytics

Pros & Cons Analysis

Google App Engine

Pros

• Fully managed infrastructure
• Pay only for what you use
• Quick and easy setup
• Scales automatically

Cons

• Vendor lock-in
• Limited programming language options
• Not suitable for complex applications
• No SSH access

IBM Cloudant

Pros

• Fully managed service
• High availability
• Scalable
• Flexible data schema
• Real-time sync
• Robust query support
• Enterprise security

Cons

• Can get expensive for large datasets
• Limited aggregation functions
• No graphical interface
• Steep learning curve

Pricing Comparison

Google App Engine

• Pay-As-You-Go

IBM Cloudant

• Pay-As-You-Go
• Subscription-Based