Google Code Hosting vs Bitbucket

Struggling to choose between Google Code Hosting and Bitbucket? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Google Code Hosting is a Development solution with tags like git, subversion, source-code, repository, hosting.

It boasts features such as Hosted Git and Subversion repositories, Issue tracking, Wiki for documentation, Access control for public/private repositories, Code browsing and search, Customizable webhooks and services, Download/upload via HTTPS, SSH, Project downloads and statistics and pros including Free and unlimited public repositories, Integrated issue tracking and wiki, Fast performance, Easy to use interface, Backed by Google infrastructure.

On the other hand, Bitbucket is a Development product tagged with git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

Its standout features include Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc, and it shines with pros like Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

Feature	Google Code Hosting	Bitbucket
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Google Code Hosting

Description: Google Code Hosting was a free web-based source code repository hosted by Google. It opened in 2006 and closed in 2016. It offered Git and Subversion version control and a bug tracker.

Bitbucket

Description: Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

Key Features Comparison

Google Code Hosting Features

• Hosted Git and Subversion repositories
• Issue tracking
• Wiki for documentation
• Access control for public/private repositories
• Code browsing and search
• Customizable webhooks and services
• Download/upload via HTTPS, SSH
• Project downloads and statistics

Bitbucket Features

• Git and Mercurial version control
• Pull requests for code review
• Issue tracking
• Code search
• Wikis for documentation
• Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

Pros & Cons Analysis

Google Code Hosting

Pros

• Free and unlimited public repositories
• Integrated issue tracking and wiki
• Fast performance
• Easy to use interface
• Backed by Google infrastructure

Cons

• Limited to open source projects
• No desktop client
• Only Git and Subversion support
• Discontinued in 2016 with short notice

Bitbucket

Pros

• Unlimited private repositories for small teams
• Great integration with other Atlassian products
• Powerful branch permissions and workflows
• Fast and reliable performance

Cons

• Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan
• Missing some features of GitHub like social coding
• Web interface not as polished as GitHub

Pricing Comparison

Google Code Hosting

• Free

Bitbucket

• Free
• Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
• Premium ($6-21 per user/month)