Google Code Hosting vs Bitbucket

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Google Code Hosting icon
Google Code Hosting
Bitbucket icon
Bitbucket

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Google Code Hosting and Bitbucket? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Google Code Hosting is a Development solution with tags like git, subversion, source-code, repository, hosting.

It boasts features such as Hosted Git and Subversion repositories, Issue tracking, Wiki for documentation, Access control for public/private repositories, Code browsing and search, Customizable webhooks and services, Download/upload via HTTPS, SSH, Project downloads and statistics and pros including Free and unlimited public repositories, Integrated issue tracking and wiki, Fast performance, Easy to use interface, Backed by Google infrastructure.

On the other hand, Bitbucket is a Development product tagged with git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

Its standout features include Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc, and it shines with pros like Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Google Code Hosting and Bitbucket?

When evaluating Google Code Hosting versus Bitbucket, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Google Code Hosting and Bitbucket have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include git, subversion, source-code.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Google Code Hosting and Bitbucket significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include git, subversion, source-code, repository.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include git, subversion and git, mercurial.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Google Code Hosting and Bitbucket. You might also explore git, subversion, source-code for alternative approaches.

Feature Google Code Hosting Bitbucket
Overall Score N/A 1
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Google Code Hosting
Google Code Hosting

Description: Google Code Hosting was a free web-based source code repository hosted by Google. It opened in 2006 and closed in 2016. It offered Git and Subversion version control and a bug tracker.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Bitbucket
Bitbucket

Description: Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Google Code Hosting
Google Code Hosting Features
  • Hosted Git and Subversion repositories
  • Issue tracking
  • Wiki for documentation
  • Access control for public/private repositories
  • Code browsing and search
  • Customizable webhooks and services
  • Download/upload via HTTPS, SSH
  • Project downloads and statistics
Bitbucket
Bitbucket Features
  • Git and Mercurial version control
  • Pull requests for code review
  • Issue tracking
  • Code search
  • Wikis for documentation
  • Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

Pros & Cons Analysis

Google Code Hosting
Google Code Hosting
Pros
  • Free and unlimited public repositories
  • Integrated issue tracking and wiki
  • Fast performance
  • Easy to use interface
  • Backed by Google infrastructure
Cons
  • Limited to open source projects
  • No desktop client
  • Only Git and Subversion support
  • Discontinued in 2016 with short notice
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Pros
  • Unlimited private repositories for small teams
  • Great integration with other Atlassian products
  • Powerful branch permissions and workflows
  • Fast and reliable performance
Cons
  • Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan
  • Missing some features of GitHub like social coding
  • Web interface not as polished as GitHub

Pricing Comparison

Google Code Hosting
Google Code Hosting
  • Free
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
  • Free
  • Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
  • Premium ($6-21 per user/month)

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs