Google Scholar vs Scopus

Struggling to choose between Google Scholar and Scopus? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Google Scholar is a Education & Reference solution with tags like academic, research, literature-search, citation-management.

It boasts features such as Search engine for academic literature, Indexes articles, theses, books, abstracts, court opinions, Covers many disciplines and sources, Shows citations and versions of each paper, Related articles and cited by features, Author profile pages, Saves searches and sends alerts, Metrics like h-index and i10-index, Integrates with Google for full text access and pros including Free to use, Comprehensive coverage, Good for interdisciplinary research, Shows impact with citation metrics, Easy to use and integrate with Google, Helps find related research.

On the other hand, Scopus is a Education & Reference product tagged with research, abstracts, citations, journals, metrics.

Its standout features include Largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, Covers scientific journals, books, and conference proceedings, Includes over 75 million records, Covers fields like science, technology, medicine, social sciences, arts, and humanities, Allows users to track citations over time for research topics and publications, Provides citation analysis tools to determine journal impact factor, and it shines with pros like Comprehensive coverage of peer-reviewed publications, Powerful search and discovery tools, Citations analysis and metrics, Integrates seamlessly with reference management tools, Useful for interdisciplinary research.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Google Scholar is a free online academic database that indexes scholarly literature across disciplines and sources. It allows users to search for peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, abstracts, and court opinions.

Categories:
academic research literature-search citation-management

Google Scholar Features

  1. Search engine for academic literature
  2. Indexes articles, theses, books, abstracts, court opinions
  3. Covers many disciplines and sources
  4. Shows citations and versions of each paper
  5. Related articles and cited by features
  6. Author profile pages
  7. Saves searches and sends alerts
  8. Metrics like h-index and i10-index
  9. Integrates with Google for full text access

Pricing

  • Free

Pros

Free to use

Comprehensive coverage

Good for interdisciplinary research

Shows impact with citation metrics

Easy to use and integrate with Google

Helps find related research

Cons

Not all sources are indexed

Does not include unpublished papers

Ranking algorithm lacks transparency

Too much irrelevant content in results

Limited advanced search options

No full text access


Scopus

Scopus

Scopus is a large abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature. It covers scientific journals, books, and conference proceedings in the fields of science, technology, medicine, social sciences, arts, and humanities.

Categories:
research abstracts citations journals metrics

Scopus Features

  1. Largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature
  2. Covers scientific journals, books, and conference proceedings
  3. Includes over 75 million records
  4. Covers fields like science, technology, medicine, social sciences, arts, and humanities
  5. Allows users to track citations over time for research topics and publications
  6. Provides citation analysis tools to determine journal impact factor

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Comprehensive coverage of peer-reviewed publications

Powerful search and discovery tools

Citations analysis and metrics

Integrates seamlessly with reference management tools

Useful for interdisciplinary research

Cons

Limited full-text access

Not all journals are indexed

Difficult to search comprehensively across broad topics

Analytics tools could be more intuitive

Expensive subscription fees