GraphWalker vs Silktest

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

GraphWalker icon
GraphWalker
Silktest icon
Silktest

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between GraphWalker and Silktest? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GraphWalker is a Development solution with tags like testing, automation, modelbased-testing.

It boasts features such as Model-based testing, Automated test case generation, Multiple test generation algorithms, Test execution, Reporting, Integration with test management tools and pros including Automates tedious test case design, Enables risk-based testing, Saves time compared to manual testing, Open source and free.

On the other hand, Silktest is a Development product tagged with automated-testing, functional-testing, regression-testing, crossbrowser-testing, object-recognition, debugging.

Its standout features include Supports multiple languages like Java, .NET, Python, PHP, etc, Allows cross-browser testing across Chrome, Firefox, IE, Safari, etc, Provides object recognition and recording capabilities, Has debugging features like screenshots and logs, Integrates with CI/CD pipelines, Supports testing on real mobile devices, Offers data-driven testing capabilities, and it shines with pros like Reduces manual testing time and effort, Enables robust and repeatable testing, Supports test automation for various platforms and browsers, Powerful object recognition makes test script creation fast, Detailed debugging information helps fix issues quickly.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare GraphWalker and Silktest?

When evaluating GraphWalker versus Silktest, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

GraphWalker and Silktest have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include testing, automation, modelbased-testing.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between GraphWalker and Silktest significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include testing, automation, modelbased-testing.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include testing, automation and automated-testing, functional-testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between GraphWalker and Silktest. You might also explore testing, automation, modelbased-testing for alternative approaches.

Feature GraphWalker Silktest
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

GraphWalker
GraphWalker

Description: GraphWalker is an open source test automation tool for model-based testing. It allows you to automatically generate and execute test cases based on a model of the system under test.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Silktest
Silktest

Description: Silktest is an automated functional and regression testing tool for web, mobile, and desktop applications. It supports multiple languages and frameworks and allows for cross-browser testing. Silktest is known for its object recognition capabilities and debugging features.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

GraphWalker
GraphWalker Features
  • Model-based testing
  • Automated test case generation
  • Multiple test generation algorithms
  • Test execution
  • Reporting
  • Integration with test management tools
Silktest
Silktest Features
  • Supports multiple languages like Java, .NET, Python, PHP, etc
  • Allows cross-browser testing across Chrome, Firefox, IE, Safari, etc
  • Provides object recognition and recording capabilities
  • Has debugging features like screenshots and logs
  • Integrates with CI/CD pipelines
  • Supports testing on real mobile devices
  • Offers data-driven testing capabilities

Pros & Cons Analysis

GraphWalker
GraphWalker
Pros
  • Automates tedious test case design
  • Enables risk-based testing
  • Saves time compared to manual testing
  • Open source and free
Cons
  • Requires modeling expertise
  • Integration can be challenging
  • Limited support available
Silktest
Silktest
Pros
  • Reduces manual testing time and effort
  • Enables robust and repeatable testing
  • Supports test automation for various platforms and browsers
  • Powerful object recognition makes test script creation fast
  • Detailed debugging information helps fix issues quickly
Cons
  • Initial script creation can be time consuming
  • Maintenance of scripts can be challenging as application changes
  • Limited support for some newer frameworks like Angular
  • Steep learning curve for some features
  • Can be expensive compared to open source tools

Pricing Comparison

GraphWalker
GraphWalker
  • Open Source
Silktest
Silktest
  • Subscription-Based
  • Pay-As-You-Go

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs