gw.run vs localhost.run

Struggling to choose between gw.run and localhost.run? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

gw.run is a Development solution with tags like workflows, automation, opensource.

It boasts features such as Graphical interface for building workflows, Connectors for various data sources and services, Scheduling and monitoring workflows, Version control and collaboration, Open source and self-hosted and pros including Intuitive visual workflow builder, Large library of pre-built components, Active open source community, Self-hosted option for maximum control, Free and open source.

On the other hand, localhost.run is a Development product tagged with localhost, development-environment, sandbox.

Its standout features include Browser-based development environments, Preconfigured sandboxes for various languages and frameworks, Collaboration features like shareable URLs and multiplayer mode, Integrated terminal and file explorer, Snapshots to save state of environments, GitHub/GitLab integration, and it shines with pros like No need to install languages/tools locally, Disposable environments, Fast setup, Accessible from any device, Collaboration capabilities, GitHub integration.

Feature	gw.run	localhost.run
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

gw.run

Description: gw.run is an open-source software for running workflows and automating tasks. It allows you to easily create workflows with a graphical interface and connect to various data sources and services.

localhost.run

Description: localhost.run is a platform that allows you to easily spin up local development environments inside your browser. It eliminates the need to install software locally by providing disposable, ready-to-code sandboxes for various languages and frameworks.

Key Features Comparison

gw.run Features

• Graphical interface for building workflows
• Connectors for various data sources and services
• Scheduling and monitoring workflows
• Version control and collaboration
• Open source and self-hosted

localhost.run Features

• Browser-based development environments
• Preconfigured sandboxes for various languages and frameworks
• Collaboration features like shareable URLs and multiplayer mode
• Integrated terminal and file explorer
• Snapshots to save state of environments
• GitHub/GitLab integration

Pros & Cons Analysis

gw.run

Pros

• Intuitive visual workflow builder
• Large library of pre-built components
• Active open source community
• Self-hosted option for maximum control
• Free and open source

Cons

• Limited integrations compared to commercial products
• Steeper learning curve than some no-code tools
• Not as feature rich as paid options

localhost.run

Pros

• No need to install languages/tools locally
• Disposable environments
• Fast setup
• Accessible from any device
• Collaboration capabilities
• GitHub integration

Cons

• Limited to web-based languages/frameworks
• Performance dependent on browser/internet speed
• Features may be limited compared to local setup
• Requires internet connection

Pricing Comparison

gw.run

• Open Source
• Self-Hosted

localhost.run

• Freemium