Hakyll vs Glyph static site generator

Struggling to choose between Hakyll and Glyph static site generator? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Hakyll is a Development solution with tags like haskell, static, site, generator, markdown, templates, rules-engine, code-highlighting.

It boasts features such as Static site generator, Written in Haskell, Compiles markdown, templates, configs to HTML, Flexible rules engine, Automatic rebuilds on changes, Code highlighting, Template support and pros including Open source, Fast performance, Type safety from Haskell, Active community, Extensible architecture.

On the other hand, Glyph static site generator is a Development product tagged with python, jinja, markdown, blogs, documentation, websites.

Its standout features include Static site generator, Written in Python, Transforms markdown into HTML, Uses Jinja templates, Lightweight and customizable, Good for blogs, docs sites, simple websites, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy to customize, Fast performance, Low resource usage, Supports markdown content.

Feature	Hakyll	Glyph static site generator
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Hakyll

Description: Hakyll is an open source static site generator written in Haskell. It allows you to build complex static websites by compiling markdown, templates, configs into flat HTML files. Key features include flexible rules engine, automatic rebuilds on changes, and support for code highlighting and templates.

Glyph static site generator

Description: Glyph is an open-source static site generator written in Python. It transforms markdown and other input files into HTML pages using Jinja templates. Glyph is lightweight, customizable, and good for blogs, documentation sites, and simple websites.

Key Features Comparison

Hakyll Features

• Static site generator
• Written in Haskell
• Compiles markdown, templates, configs to HTML
• Flexible rules engine
• Automatic rebuilds on changes
• Code highlighting
• Template support

Glyph static site generator Features

• Static site generator
• Written in Python
• Transforms markdown into HTML
• Uses Jinja templates
• Lightweight and customizable
• Good for blogs, docs sites, simple websites

Pros & Cons Analysis

Hakyll

Pros

• Open source
• Fast performance
• Type safety from Haskell
• Active community
• Extensible architecture

Cons

• Steep learning curve for Haskell
• Less plugin ecosystem than other generators
• More involved to customize output
• Not beginner friendly

Glyph static site generator

Pros

• Open source
• Easy to customize
• Fast performance
• Low resource usage
• Supports markdown content

Cons

• Less features than some competitors
• Steeper learning curve than simple static site generators
• Requires knowledge of Python, Jinja, HTML/CSS
• Not as flexible as dynamic CMS platforms

Pricing Comparison

Hakyll

• Open Source

Glyph static site generator

• Open Source