HippoPlayer vs Qmmp

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

HippoPlayer icon
HippoPlayer
Qmmp icon
Qmmp

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between HippoPlayer and Qmmp? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

HippoPlayer is a Video & Movies solution with tags like opensource, media-player, audio, video, windows, mac, linux, skins, plugins, lyric-fetching, lastfm-scrobbling, equalizer.

It boasts features such as Plays a wide range of audio and video formats, Customizable skins, Plugins, Lyrics support, Last.fm scrobbling, Equalizer and pros including Open source, Cross-platform - works on Windows, Mac and Linux, Lightweight, Supports many formats out of the box, Active development and community support.

On the other hand, Qmmp is a Audio & Music product tagged with audio, music, player, winamp, skins, plugins.

Its standout features include Qt-based interface, Supports many audio formats like MP3, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, Musepack, WAV, etc, Equalizer with presets, Playlist support, Supports Winamp 2.x skins, Supports plugins for added functionality, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Good audio quality, Active development and updates, Customizable via skins and plugins, Cross-platform - works on Linux, Windows, macOS.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare HippoPlayer and Qmmp?

When evaluating HippoPlayer versus Qmmp, both solutions serve different needs within the video & movies ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

HippoPlayer and Qmmp have established themselves in the video & movies market. Key areas include opensource, media-player, audio.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between HippoPlayer and Qmmp significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include opensource, media-player, audio, video.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include opensource, media-player and audio, music.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between HippoPlayer and Qmmp. You might also explore opensource, media-player, audio for alternative approaches.

Feature HippoPlayer Qmmp
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Video & Movies Audio & Music
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

HippoPlayer
HippoPlayer

Description: HippoPlayer is an open-source media player for Windows, Mac and Linux. It supports playing a wide range of audio and video formats. Key features include skins, plugins, lyric fetching, last.fm scrobbling and equalizer.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Qmmp
Qmmp

Description: Qmmp is an open-source audio player for Linux that supports many audio formats. It aims to be a Winamp clone with support for skins and plugins.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

HippoPlayer
HippoPlayer Features
  • Plays a wide range of audio and video formats
  • Customizable skins
  • Plugins
  • Lyrics support
  • Last.fm scrobbling
  • Equalizer
Qmmp
Qmmp Features
  • Qt-based interface
  • Supports many audio formats like MP3, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, Musepack, WAV, etc
  • Equalizer with presets
  • Playlist support
  • Supports Winamp 2.x skins
  • Supports plugins for added functionality

Pros & Cons Analysis

HippoPlayer
HippoPlayer
Pros
  • Open source
  • Cross-platform - works on Windows, Mac and Linux
  • Lightweight
  • Supports many formats out of the box
  • Active development and community support
Cons
  • Lacks some advanced features of proprietary media players
  • Skins and plugins can be hit or miss in quality
  • Scrobbling support is not as robust as dedicated last.fm apps
Qmmp
Qmmp
Pros
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Good audio quality
  • Active development and updates
  • Customizable via skins and plugins
  • Cross-platform - works on Linux, Windows, macOS
Cons
  • Limited playlist management features
  • No support for online media streaming
  • Less plugins compared to more popular players
  • No mobile app version

Pricing Comparison

HippoPlayer
HippoPlayer
  • Open Source
Qmmp
Qmmp
  • Open Source

Get More Information

HippoPlayer
HippoPlayer
HippoPlayer
Learn More About HippoPlayer
Qmmp
Qmmp
Qmmp
Learn More About Qmmp

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Suggest smarter. Switch faster.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal