HTMX vs intercooler.js

Struggling to choose between HTMX and intercooler.js? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

HTMX is a Development solution with tags like ajax, html, javascript.

It boasts features such as Allows AJAX, WebSockets, and server-sent events directly in HTML without JavaScript, Lets you build modern UIs with simple, declarative HTML, Uses attributes like hx-get, hx-post, hx-ws for requests, Supports prefetching via hx-prefetch attribute, Works with CSS transitions via hx-swap attribute, Has built-in support for animation queues, Provides hx-indicator attribute for loading indicators, Has hx-push-url for client-side URL pushing, Includes hx-confirm for request confirmation prompts and pros including Declarative syntax makes code simpler, No need to write separate JavaScript code, Good for progressive enhancement, Lightweight at ~12kB gzipped, Integrates well with existing frameworks.

On the other hand, intercooler.js is a Development product tagged with ajax, reactive, spa.

Its standout features include Declarative AJAX, Server-side rendering support, Progressive enhancement, Dependency-free, and it shines with pros like Cleaner code, Easier to maintain, Good documentation, Active community.

Feature	HTMX	intercooler.js
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

HTMX

Description: HTMX is a JavaScript library that allows you to access AJAX, CSS transitions, WebSockets and server side events directly in HTML without JavaScript. It lets you build modern user interfaces with simple, declarative HTML.

intercooler.js

Description: Intercooler.js is a popular open-source JavaScript library for building reactive single-page applications. It allows adding AJAX functionality to a website without writing JavaScript callbacks, using HTML attributes and semantic HTTP requests instead.

Key Features Comparison

HTMX Features

• Allows AJAX, WebSockets, and server-sent events directly in HTML without JavaScript
• Lets you build modern UIs with simple, declarative HTML
• Uses attributes like hx-get, hx-post, hx-ws for requests
• Supports prefetching via hx-prefetch attribute
• Works with CSS transitions via hx-swap attribute
• Has built-in support for animation queues
• Provides hx-indicator attribute for loading indicators
• Has hx-push-url for client-side URL pushing
• Includes hx-confirm for request confirmation prompts

intercooler.js Features

• Declarative AJAX
• Server-side rendering support
• Progressive enhancement
• Dependency-free

Pros & Cons Analysis

HTMX

Pros

• Declarative syntax makes code simpler
• No need to write separate JavaScript code
• Good for progressive enhancement
• Lightweight at ~12kB gzipped
• Integrates well with existing frameworks

Cons

• Relies heavily on HTML attributes
• Not as flexible as hand-written JavaScript
• Limited browser support in IE
• Less customizable than jQuery AJAX
• Some advanced features have poor documentation

intercooler.js

Pros

• Cleaner code
• Easier to maintain
• Good documentation
• Active community

Cons

• Steeper learning curve
• Less flexible than vanilla JS AJAX
• Limited browser support

Pricing Comparison

HTMX

• Open Source

intercooler.js

• Open Source