Httper vs TestMace

Struggling to choose between Httper and TestMace? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Httper is a Development solution with tags like http, client, testing, api, debugging.

It boasts features such as User-friendly interface, Allows sending various HTTP requests (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.), Supports adding headers, cookies, authentication, Provides response viewer with syntax highlighting, Can save requests for later use, Allows mocking servers and endpoints, Has recording and replay functionality, Integrates with Charles Proxy, Provides performance and timing metrics and pros including Easy to use, Powerful features, Great for testing APIs, Good for debugging web services, Mocking capability is very useful, Lightweight and fast.

On the other hand, TestMace is a Development product tagged with test-automation, web-testing, mobile-testing, record-and-playback, crossbrowser-testing, cicd.

Its standout features include Record and playback, Cross-browser testing, CI/CD integrations, No-code test creation, Parallel test execution, Reporting and dashboards, and it shines with pros like Open-source and free to use, Ease of use for non-technical users, Supports web and mobile app testing, Integrates with popular CI/CD tools.

Feature	Httper	TestMace
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Httper

Description: Httper is a user-friendly HTTP client that allows you to test web services, mock servers, and debug APIs. It has an intuitive interface for building requests, viewing responses, and analyzing performance.

TestMace

Description: TestMace is an open-source test automation framework for web and mobile apps. It allows creating and executing automated tests without coding. Key features include record and playback, cross-browser testing, CI/CD integrations, and more.

Key Features Comparison

Httper Features

• User-friendly interface
• Allows sending various HTTP requests (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.)
• Supports adding headers, cookies, authentication
• Provides response viewer with syntax highlighting
• Can save requests for later use
• Allows mocking servers and endpoints
• Has recording and replay functionality
• Integrates with Charles Proxy
• Provides performance and timing metrics

TestMace Features

• Record and playback
• Cross-browser testing
• CI/CD integrations
• No-code test creation
• Parallel test execution
• Reporting and dashboards

Pros & Cons Analysis

Httper

Pros

• Easy to use
• Powerful features
• Great for testing APIs
• Good for debugging web services
• Mocking capability is very useful
• Lightweight and fast

Cons

• No browser extension
• Limited reporting capabilities
• No automated testing features
• Not ideal for large-scale API testing

TestMace

Pros

• Open-source and free to use
• Ease of use for non-technical users
• Supports web and mobile app testing
• Integrates with popular CI/CD tools

Cons

• Limited customization options
• Fewer features compared to commercial tools
• Smaller community and fewer resources

Pricing Comparison

Httper

• Free

TestMace

• Open Source