HTTPulse vs Gatling.io

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

HTTPulse icon
HTTPulse
Gatling.io icon
Gatling.io

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between HTTPulse and Gatling.io? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

HTTPulse is a Development solution with tags like proxy, http, monitor, debug, inspect, traffic.

It boasts features such as Network traffic monitoring, HTTP request inspection, HTTP response inspection, Modify HTTP requests and responses, Replay captured HTTP traffic, Save HTTP conversations, Mock HTTP responses and pros including Open source, Free to use, Good for debugging web apps, Allows inspection of HTTP traffic, Can modify requests and responses, Can replay and mock HTTP conversations.

On the other hand, Gatling.io is a Development product tagged with load-testing, performance-testing, scalability-testing.

Its standout features include Record and playback - Record user actions and replay them to simulate load, Advanced simulation engine - Flexible scenario definition using Scala based DSL, Multiple protocols - Supports HTTP, WebSocket, JMS and more, Assertions and validations - Validate response content, status codes, timings etc, Interactive HTML reports - Detailed metrics on response time, throughput, failures etc, CLI and Maven plugin - Can integrate with CI/CD pipelines, Cloud scale testing - Integrates with Kubernetes for large scale load tests, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Powerful Scala based DSL for flexible test scenarios, Good documentation and active community support, Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, Detailed HTML reports for analysis.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare HTTPulse and Gatling.io?

When evaluating HTTPulse versus Gatling.io, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

HTTPulse and Gatling.io have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include proxy, http, monitor.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between HTTPulse and Gatling.io significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include proxy, http, monitor, debug.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include proxy, http and load-testing, performance-testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between HTTPulse and Gatling.io. You might also explore proxy, http, monitor for alternative approaches.

Feature HTTPulse Gatling.io
Overall Score N/A 1
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

HTTPulse
HTTPulse

Description: HTTPulse is an open-source web debugging proxy and HTTP monitor that allows developers to inspect traffic between web apps and servers. It can capture, inspect, modify, replay, save, and mock HTTP requests and responses.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Gatling.io
Gatling.io

Description: Gatling.io is an open-source load and performance testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty. It allows users to simulate load on a system and analyze overall performance under various user loads. Gatling is used for testing APIs, microservices and web applications.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

HTTPulse
HTTPulse Features
  • Network traffic monitoring
  • HTTP request inspection
  • HTTP response inspection
  • Modify HTTP requests and responses
  • Replay captured HTTP traffic
  • Save HTTP conversations
  • Mock HTTP responses
Gatling.io
Gatling.io Features
  • Record and playback - Record user actions and replay them to simulate load
  • Advanced simulation engine - Flexible scenario definition using Scala based DSL
  • Multiple protocols - Supports HTTP, WebSocket, JMS and more
  • Assertions and validations - Validate response content, status codes, timings etc
  • Interactive HTML reports - Detailed metrics on response time, throughput, failures etc
  • CLI and Maven plugin - Can integrate with CI/CD pipelines
  • Cloud scale testing - Integrates with Kubernetes for large scale load tests

Pros & Cons Analysis

HTTPulse
HTTPulse
Pros
  • Open source
  • Free to use
  • Good for debugging web apps
  • Allows inspection of HTTP traffic
  • Can modify requests and responses
  • Can replay and mock HTTP conversations
Cons
  • Limited to HTTP protocol only
  • No browser extension for easy use
  • Steep learning curve
  • No automated tests or reporting
Gatling.io
Gatling.io
Pros
  • Open source and free to use
  • Powerful Scala based DSL for flexible test scenarios
  • Good documentation and active community support
  • Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines
  • Detailed HTML reports for analysis
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for Scala DSL
  • Limited debugging capabilities compared to commercial tools
  • Lacks some enterprise features like SLA reporting
  • Not ideal for non-technical users

Pricing Comparison

HTTPulse
HTTPulse
  • Open Source
Gatling.io
Gatling.io
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs