Hugs vs Utrecht Haskell Compiler

Struggling to choose between Hugs and Utrecht Haskell Compiler? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Hugs is a Development solution with tags like functional-programming, academic, teaching, haskellbased.

It boasts features such as Functional programming language, Strong static type system, Type inference, Overloading, Interpreted (not compiled), Interactive environment, Built-in graphics and GUI libraries and pros including Easy to learn and use, Great for teaching functional programming concepts, Very high-level language, Type safety catches many bugs, Interactive environment good for exploration.

On the other hand, Utrecht Haskell Compiler is a Development product tagged with haskell, compiler, functional-programming.

Its standout features include Compiles Haskell code to native machine code, Focuses on high performance, Modular compiler design, Open source, Standards compliant, and it shines with pros like Very fast code compilation, Clean and understandable code output, Active open source community support, Adheres closely to Haskell language standards.

Feature	Hugs	Utrecht Haskell Compiler
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Hugs

Description: Hugs is an open-source functional programming language used mainly in academia for teaching and research. It has a strong static type system, based on Haskell, that allows type inference and overloading. Hugs emphasizes simplicity and ease of use.

Utrecht Haskell Compiler

Description: The Utrecht Haskell Compiler (UHC) is an open-source Haskell compiler that focuses on speed, modular design, and standards compliance. It compiles Haskell code to native machine code for high performance.

Key Features Comparison

Hugs Features

• Functional programming language
• Strong static type system
• Type inference
• Overloading
• Interpreted (not compiled)
• Interactive environment
• Built-in graphics and GUI libraries

Utrecht Haskell Compiler Features

• Compiles Haskell code to native machine code
• Focuses on high performance
• Modular compiler design
• Open source
• Standards compliant

Pros & Cons Analysis

Hugs

Pros

• Easy to learn and use
• Great for teaching functional programming concepts
• Very high-level language
• Type safety catches many bugs
• Interactive environment good for exploration

Cons

• Not great for large production systems
• Performance not as good as compiled languages
• Limited libraries compared to more popular languages

Utrecht Haskell Compiler

Pros

• Very fast code compilation
• Clean and understandable code output
• Active open source community support
• Adheres closely to Haskell language standards

Cons

• Limited platform support compared to GHC
• Smaller user base than other Haskell compilers
• Less extensive library support
• Not as mature as GHC

Pricing Comparison

Hugs

• Open Source
• Free

Utrecht Haskell Compiler

• Open Source