Hunter Package Manager vs build2

Struggling to choose between Hunter Package Manager and build2? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Hunter Package Manager is a Development solution with tags like c, cmake, dependency-management, open-source.

It boasts features such as CMake-based package manager for C++, Manages dependencies and external libraries, Cross-platform support, Integration with CMake build system, Binary caching to avoid rebuilds, Support for multiple C++ compilers and pros including Simplifies dependency management for C++ projects, Avoids need to build dependencies manually, Easier to share C++ projects across platforms, Integrates seamlessly with CMake workflow, Speeds up builds by caching binaries.

On the other hand, build2 is a Development product tagged with build, dependency-management, incremental-builds.

Its standout features include Incremental builds, Build caching, Cross-compilation support, Package manager, and it shines with pros like Fast incremental builds, Efficient dependency management, Good cross-platform support.

Feature	Hunter Package Manager	build2
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Hunter Package Manager

Description: Hunter is a CMake-based cross-platform package manager for C++. It helps manage dependencies and external libraries in C++ projects by integrating with CMake. Useful for open-source C++ projects that need to manage dependencies.

build2

Description: build2 is a software construction toolchain focused on build system and dependency management. It features fast incremental builds, build caching, cross-compilation support, and a package manager.

Key Features Comparison

Hunter Package Manager Features

• CMake-based package manager for C++
• Manages dependencies and external libraries
• Cross-platform support
• Integration with CMake build system
• Binary caching to avoid rebuilds
• Support for multiple C++ compilers

build2 Features

• Incremental builds
• Build caching
• Cross-compilation support
• Package manager

Pros & Cons Analysis

Hunter Package Manager

Pros

• Simplifies dependency management for C++ projects
• Avoids need to build dependencies manually
• Easier to share C++ projects across platforms
• Integrates seamlessly with CMake workflow
• Speeds up builds by caching binaries

Cons

• Limited number of packages compared to other managers
• Less flexible than full package managers like Conan
• Only useful for C++ projects using CMake
• Requires CMake knowledge to use effectively

build2

Pros

• Fast incremental builds
• Efficient dependency management
• Good cross-platform support

Cons

• Limited adoption
• Steep learning curve

Pricing Comparison

Hunter Package Manager

• Open Source

build2

• Open Source