i3 vs Hyprland

Struggling to choose between i3 and Hyprland? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

i3 is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, configurable, unixlike.

It boasts features such as Tiling window manager, Tree-like window organization, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, Simple, lightweight and fast, Support for multiple workspaces and pros including Very efficient use of screen space, Highly customizable, Light on system resources, Keyboard-driven workflow, Stable and mature codebase.

On the other hand, Hyprland is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, minimal, fast, customizable, wayland.

Its standout features include Dynamic tiling, Customizable, Minimal resource usage, Supports tiling, floating and fullscreen layouts, Multiple monitor support, and it shines with pros like Very fast and lightweight, Highly customizable, Efficient use of screen space with tiling, Supports Wayland natively.

Feature	i3	Hyprland
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

i3

Description: i3 is a tiling window manager for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It is designed to be simple, fast, and lightweight while still being customizable and flexible. i3 organizes application windows in a tree-like structure and allows efficient window switching and placement.

Hyprland

Description: Hyprland is a dynamic tiling Wayland compositor known for its speed, customizability and minimal resource usage. It supports tiling, floating and fullscreen layouts, as well as multiple monitors.

Key Features Comparison

i3 Features

• Tiling window manager
• Tree-like window organization
• Customizable keyboard shortcuts
• Simple, lightweight and fast
• Support for multiple workspaces

Hyprland Features

• Dynamic tiling
• Customizable
• Minimal resource usage
• Supports tiling, floating and fullscreen layouts
• Multiple monitor support

Pros & Cons Analysis

i3

Pros

• Very efficient use of screen space
• Highly customizable
• Light on system resources
• Keyboard-driven workflow
• Stable and mature codebase

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Not designed for touchscreens
• Less flexibility in window arrangements
• Less integrated with desktop environment

Hyprland

Pros

• Very fast and lightweight
• Highly customizable
• Efficient use of screen space with tiling
• Supports Wayland natively

Cons

• Still relatively new and may have bugs
• Limited documentation
• Less plugins/extensions than more mature compositors like i3

Pricing Comparison

i3

• Open Source
• Free

Hyprland

• Open Source