i3 vs i3-gaps

Struggling to choose between i3 and i3-gaps? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

i3 is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, configurable, unixlike.

It boasts features such as Tiling window manager, Tree-like window organization, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, Simple, lightweight and fast, Support for multiple workspaces and pros including Very efficient use of screen space, Highly customizable, Light on system resources, Keyboard-driven workflow, Stable and mature codebase.

On the other hand, i3-gaps is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, customizable, gaps-between-windows.

Its standout features include Tiling window manager, Keyboard driven, Customizable via config file, Gaps between windows, Split-screen functionality, Workspace support, Status bar, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Efficient use of screen space, Very customizable, Keyboard shortcuts for everything, Low resource usage.

Feature	i3	i3-gaps
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

i3

Description: i3 is a tiling window manager for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It is designed to be simple, fast, and lightweight while still being customizable and flexible. i3 organizes application windows in a tree-like structure and allows efficient window switching and placement.

i3-gaps

Description: i3-gaps is a fork of the i3 tiling window manager that adds additional functionality like gaps between windows. It's lightweight, customizable, and keyboard-driven.

Key Features Comparison

i3 Features

• Tiling window manager
• Tree-like window organization
• Customizable keyboard shortcuts
• Simple, lightweight and fast
• Support for multiple workspaces

i3-gaps Features

• Tiling window manager
• Keyboard driven
• Customizable via config file
• Gaps between windows
• Split-screen functionality
• Workspace support
• Status bar

Pros & Cons Analysis

i3

Pros

• Very efficient use of screen space
• Highly customizable
• Light on system resources
• Keyboard-driven workflow
• Stable and mature codebase

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Not designed for touchscreens
• Less flexibility in window arrangements
• Less integrated with desktop environment

i3-gaps

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Efficient use of screen space
• Very customizable
• Keyboard shortcuts for everything
• Low resource usage

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Not beginner friendly
• No mouse support
• Limited desktop effects

Pricing Comparison

i3

• Open Source
• Free

i3-gaps

• Open Source