IceWM vs bspwm

Struggling to choose between IceWM and bspwm? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

IceWM is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like lightweight, fast, simple, x11.

It boasts features such as Lightweight and fast, Supports modern X11 standards, Themeable and customizable, Virtual desktops, Taskbar and system tray, Keyboard shortcuts, Window tabs, Session management and pros including Very lightweight and fast, Low resource usage, Highly customizable, Good performance on older hardware, Active development and support.

On the other hand, bspwm is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, binary-space-partitioning, efficient-screen-space, external-configuration.

Its standout features include Binary space partitioning window layout, Keyboard driven window management, Flexible rule-based configuration, Support for multi-monitor setups, Minimal resource usage, and it shines with pros like Very efficient use of screen space, Highly customizable with scripts, Lightweight and fast, Keyboard shortcuts for window management, Low memory footprint.

Feature	IceWM	bspwm
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

IceWM

Description: IceWM is a fast, lightweight window manager for the X Window System. It aims to be simple, fast, and lightweight while still being customizable and functional.

bspwm

Description: bspwm is a lightweight, keyboard-driven tiling window manager for Linux. It organizes windows in a binary space partitioning layout for efficient use of screen space. Configuration is done mostly through external scripts rather than built-in settings.

Key Features Comparison

IceWM Features

• Lightweight and fast
• Supports modern X11 standards
• Themeable and customizable
• Virtual desktops
• Taskbar and system tray
• Keyboard shortcuts
• Window tabs
• Session management

bspwm Features

• Binary space partitioning window layout
• Keyboard driven window management
• Flexible rule-based configuration
• Support for multi-monitor setups
• Minimal resource usage

Pros & Cons Analysis

IceWM

Pros

• Very lightweight and fast
• Low resource usage
• Highly customizable
• Good performance on older hardware
• Active development and support

Cons

• Less features than full desktop environments
• Steeper learning curve than beginner-friendly DEs
• Less out-of-box polish than heavier DEs
• Limited integration with desktop services

bspwm

Pros

• Very efficient use of screen space
• Highly customizable with scripts
• Lightweight and fast
• Keyboard shortcuts for window management
• Low memory footprint

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Lack of GUI or menu
• Not beginner friendly
• Requires external scripts for some functionality

Pricing Comparison

IceWM

• Open Source
• Free

bspwm

• Open Source