Infinispan vs Hazelcast

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Infinispan icon
Infinispan
Hazelcast icon
Hazelcast

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Infinispan and Hazelcast? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Infinispan is a Development solution with tags like caching, distributed-cache, inmemory-data-grid.

It boasts features such as Distributed in-memory key/value data store, Supports transactions, Data partitioning, Data replication, Persistence to disk or database, Querying and indexing, Caching for databases, Clustering and high availability and pros including Very fast data access, Scalable and elastic, Fault tolerant, Supports many data structures, Integrates with many frameworks/platforms, Open source with large community.

On the other hand, Hazelcast is a Development product tagged with caching, processing-streams, clustering.

Its standout features include Distributed in-memory data store, Low latency data access, Automatic sharding and rebalancing, ACID transactions, Querying and aggregation, Event journaling, Multi-datacenter replication, Web session clustering, Continuous query, Machine learning, and it shines with pros like Fast performance, Easy scalability, High availability, Flexible deployment options, Open source, Rich ecosystem.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Infinispan and Hazelcast?

When evaluating Infinispan versus Hazelcast, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Infinispan and Hazelcast have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include caching, distributed-cache, inmemory-data-grid.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Infinispan and Hazelcast significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include caching, distributed-cache, inmemory-data-grid.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include caching, distributed-cache and caching, processing-streams.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Infinispan and Hazelcast. You might also explore caching, distributed-cache, inmemory-data-grid for alternative approaches.

Feature Infinispan Hazelcast
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Infinispan
Infinispan

Description: Infinispan is an open source in-memory data grid and distributed cache. It is used to store and retrieve data with microsecond response times, while providing data reliability and availability.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Hazelcast
Hazelcast

Description: Hazelcast is an open source in-memory data grid that enables distribution of data and computation across servers for scalability, speed, and resilience. It is commonly used for caching, processing streams, and clustering.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Infinispan
Infinispan Features
  • Distributed in-memory key/value data store
  • Supports transactions
  • Data partitioning
  • Data replication
  • Persistence to disk or database
  • Querying and indexing
  • Caching for databases
  • Clustering and high availability
Hazelcast
Hazelcast Features
  • Distributed in-memory data store
  • Low latency data access
  • Automatic sharding and rebalancing
  • ACID transactions
  • Querying and aggregation
  • Event journaling
  • Multi-datacenter replication
  • Web session clustering
  • Continuous query
  • Machine learning

Pros & Cons Analysis

Infinispan
Infinispan
Pros
  • Very fast data access
  • Scalable and elastic
  • Fault tolerant
  • Supports many data structures
  • Integrates with many frameworks/platforms
  • Open source with large community
Cons
  • Complex to configure and operate
  • Not ideal for durable long-term storage
  • Can be resource intensive
  • Not as fully featured as some proprietary options
Hazelcast
Hazelcast
Pros
  • Fast performance
  • Easy scalability
  • High availability
  • Flexible deployment options
  • Open source
  • Rich ecosystem
Cons
  • Complex configuration
  • Steep learning curve
  • No visual interface

Pricing Comparison

Infinispan
Infinispan
  • Open Source
Hazelcast
Hazelcast
  • Open Source
  • Enterprise Edition (Subscription)

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs