inlets vs gw.run

Struggling to choose between inlets and gw.run? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

inlets is a Network & Admin solution with tags like networking, tunneling, vpn, cloud, security.

It boasts features such as Expose internal services on public URLs or domains, Tunnel traffic through a single endpoint server, Use WebSockets for secure communication, No need to open firewall ports, Written in Go programming language, Open source and cloud-native and pros including Secure way to expose internal services, Easy to set up and configure, Scalable and highly available, Supports various cloud providers and on-premises environments, Lightweight and efficient.

On the other hand, gw.run is a Development product tagged with workflows, automation, opensource.

Its standout features include Graphical interface for building workflows, Connectors for various data sources and services, Scheduling and monitoring workflows, Version control and collaboration, Open source and self-hosted, and it shines with pros like Intuitive visual workflow builder, Large library of pre-built components, Active open source community, Self-hosted option for maximum control, Free and open source.

Feature	inlets	gw.run
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Development

Product Overview

inlets

Description: Inlets is an open source cloud native tunnel written in Go that can expose internal services on public URLs or domains by tunneling traffic through a single endpoint server. It uses websockets and works well for exposing services securely without opening firewall ports.

gw.run

Description: gw.run is an open-source software for running workflows and automating tasks. It allows you to easily create workflows with a graphical interface and connect to various data sources and services.

Key Features Comparison

inlets Features

• Expose internal services on public URLs or domains
• Tunnel traffic through a single endpoint server
• Use WebSockets for secure communication
• No need to open firewall ports
• Written in Go programming language
• Open source and cloud-native

gw.run Features

• Graphical interface for building workflows
• Connectors for various data sources and services
• Scheduling and monitoring workflows
• Version control and collaboration
• Open source and self-hosted

Pros & Cons Analysis

inlets

Pros

• Secure way to expose internal services
• Easy to set up and configure
• Scalable and highly available
• Supports various cloud providers and on-premises environments
• Lightweight and efficient

Cons

• Requires an external server for the tunnel endpoint
• May introduce additional latency or network overhead
• Limited to WebSocket-based communication

gw.run

Pros

• Intuitive visual workflow builder
• Large library of pre-built components
• Active open source community
• Self-hosted option for maximum control
• Free and open source

Cons

• Limited integrations compared to commercial products
• Steeper learning curve than some no-code tools
• Not as feature rich as paid options

Pricing Comparison

inlets

• Open Source

gw.run

• Open Source
• Self-Hosted