Intercepter-NG vs Termshark

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Intercepter-NG icon
Intercepter-NG
Termshark icon
Termshark

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Intercepter-NG and Termshark? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Intercepter-NG is a Network & Admin solution with tags like sniffer, packet-capture, protocol-analysis.

It boasts features such as Network traffic capture and analysis, Graphical user interface, Protocol decoding, Packet filtering, Traffic inspection, Export packet captures (PCAP), Supports common protocols like HTTP, DNS, FTP etc., Can analyze unencrypted traffic, Real-time traffic monitoring and pros including Open source and free, Easy to use graphical interface, Good for network troubleshooting, Lightweight and fast, Cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS).

On the other hand, Termshark is a Network & Admin product tagged with terminal, network, protocol, analyzer, packets, cli.

Its standout features include Captures live packet data from network interfaces, Displays packets in a terminal user interface, Filters packets using display filters, Analyzes protocols including TCP, UDP, HTTP, DNS, and more, Supports common capture file formats like PCAP and PCAPNG, Runs natively in Linux terminal without a GUI, Built on top of TShark and Wireshark libraries, and it shines with pros like Lightweight terminal-based interface, No GUI overhead or dependencies, Works over SSH connections, Fast and responsive for analyzing live captures, Powerful display filters, Leverages Wireshark protocol analysis.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Intercepter-NG and Termshark?

When evaluating Intercepter-NG versus Termshark, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Intercepter-NG and Termshark have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include sniffer, packet-capture, protocol-analysis.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Intercepter-NG and Termshark significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include sniffer, packet-capture, protocol-analysis.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include sniffer, packet-capture and terminal, network.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Intercepter-NG and Termshark. You might also explore sniffer, packet-capture, protocol-analysis for alternative approaches.

Feature Intercepter-NG Termshark
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Intercepter-NG
Intercepter-NG

Description: Intercepter-NG is an open source network sniffing and analysis tool. It allows capturing, inspection and analysis of network traffic similar to Wireshark. It has a graphical interface and supports features like protocol analysis, decoding, packet filtering and more.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Termshark
Termshark

Description: Termshark is a terminal based network protocol analyzer. It allows you to inspect network traffic and analyze packets, similar to Wireshark, but runs in a terminal instead of a graphical interface.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Intercepter-NG
Intercepter-NG Features
  • Network traffic capture and analysis
  • Graphical user interface
  • Protocol decoding
  • Packet filtering
  • Traffic inspection
  • Export packet captures (PCAP)
  • Supports common protocols like HTTP, DNS, FTP etc.
  • Can analyze unencrypted traffic
  • Real-time traffic monitoring
Termshark
Termshark Features
  • Captures live packet data from network interfaces
  • Displays packets in a terminal user interface
  • Filters packets using display filters
  • Analyzes protocols including TCP, UDP, HTTP, DNS, and more
  • Supports common capture file formats like PCAP and PCAPNG
  • Runs natively in Linux terminal without a GUI
  • Built on top of TShark and Wireshark libraries

Pros & Cons Analysis

Intercepter-NG
Intercepter-NG
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Easy to use graphical interface
  • Good for network troubleshooting
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS)
Cons
  • Cannot decrypt encrypted traffic
  • Less advanced features compared to Wireshark
  • Limited to analyzing network traffic only
  • No custom protocol support
Termshark
Termshark
Pros
  • Lightweight terminal-based interface
  • No GUI overhead or dependencies
  • Works over SSH connections
  • Fast and responsive for analyzing live captures
  • Powerful display filters
  • Leverages Wireshark protocol analysis
Cons
  • Less intuitive than GUI-based Wireshark
  • Steeper learning curve for terminal usage
  • Limited to keyboard-based interaction
  • Harder to visualize packet flows
  • No built-in statistical summaries

Pricing Comparison

Intercepter-NG
Intercepter-NG
  • Open Source
Termshark
Termshark
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs