Interpose.js vs Dust.js

Struggling to choose between Interpose.js and Dust.js? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Interpose.js is a Development solution with tags like interception, aspectoriented-programming, function-calls.

It boasts features such as Intercepts and modifies function calls, Supports synchronous and asynchronous function interception, Lightweight library with no dependencies, Easy to integrate into existing code, Allows adding cross-cutting concerns like logging without changing function code and pros including Simple and lightweight, Powerful functionality for aspect-oriented programming, Easy to use API, No dependencies, Great for implementing logging, analytics, etc without changing code.

On the other hand, Dust.js is a Development product tagged with templating, clientside, serverside.

Its standout features include Template inheritance, Automatic escaping for security, Asynchronous rendering, Streaming, Client-side and server-side rendering, Partial templates, Conditionals and loops, Helpers for formatting, Extensible with custom helpers and filters, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Secure against XSS attacks, Good documentation, Active community support, Integration with Express.js for server-side rendering, Streaming allows progressive rendering.

Feature	Interpose.js	Dust.js
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Interpose.js

Description: Interpose.js is a small JavaScript library that allows you to intercept and modify function calls. It makes aspect-oriented programming simple in JavaScript.

Dust.js

Description: Dust.js is a lightweight JavaScript templating library for both client-side and server-side rendering. It has a simple, easy-to-read syntax and aims to provide complete control of HTML output while being highly extensible.

Key Features Comparison

Interpose.js Features

• Intercepts and modifies function calls
• Supports synchronous and asynchronous function interception
• Lightweight library with no dependencies
• Easy to integrate into existing code
• Allows adding cross-cutting concerns like logging without changing function code

Dust.js Features

• Template inheritance
• Automatic escaping for security
• Asynchronous rendering
• Streaming
• Client-side and server-side rendering
• Partial templates
• Conditionals and loops
• Helpers for formatting
• Extensible with custom helpers and filters

Pros & Cons Analysis

Interpose.js

Pros

• Simple and lightweight
• Powerful functionality for aspect-oriented programming
• Easy to use API
• No dependencies
• Great for implementing logging, analytics, etc without changing code

Cons

• Only works for JavaScript code
• Can make code more complex if overused
• Requires some restructuring for proper use
• Debugging can be more difficult with aspects

Dust.js

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Secure against XSS attacks
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Integration with Express.js for server-side rendering
• Streaming allows progressive rendering

Cons

• Less flexible compared to some other templating engines
• Limited adoption outside of LinkedIn where it originated
• Requires learning non-standard syntax

Pricing Comparison

Interpose.js

• Open Source

Dust.js

• Open Source