ioBroker vs FHEM

Struggling to choose between ioBroker and FHEM? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ioBroker is a Home & Family solution with tags like opensource, home-automation, smart-home, protocols, standards, zwave, philips-hue, mqtt.

It boasts features such as Modular architecture with many plugins/adapters, Supports a wide range of smart home devices and protocols, Open source and free, Web-based user interface for monitoring and control, Rules engine for automation, Data storage and visualization, Easy integration with other systems via REST API, Active community support and development and pros including Free and open source, Very flexible and extensible, Works with many devices and standards, Easy to set up and use, Feature-rich platform for home automation.

On the other hand, FHEM is a Home & Family product tagged with automation, lighting-control, heating-control, security, sensors.

Its standout features include Controls and monitors a wide range of devices like lights, thermostats, sensors, security systems, etc, Supports many communication protocols like Z-Wave, EnOcean, MQTT, HTTP, etc, Highly customizable through plugins and scripts, Web interface for remote access and control, Rules engine for automation based on events and conditions, Notifications through email, Telegram, etc, Data logging and graphs, Voice control integration (Alexa, Google Assistant), OpenHAB and Home Assistant integration, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Very flexible and extensible, Supports many devices and protocols, Active community support, Self-hosted, not dependent on cloud services.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

ioBroker

ioBroker

ioBroker is an open-source home automation platform that allows you to integrate and control smart home devices. It works with a wide range of protocols and standards like Z-Wave, Philips Hue, MQTT, and more.

Categories:
opensource home-automation smart-home protocols standards zwave philips-hue mqtt

IoBroker Features

  1. Modular architecture with many plugins/adapters
  2. Supports a wide range of smart home devices and protocols
  3. Open source and free
  4. Web-based user interface for monitoring and control
  5. Rules engine for automation
  6. Data storage and visualization
  7. Easy integration with other systems via REST API
  8. Active community support and development

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Very flexible and extensible

Works with many devices and standards

Easy to set up and use

Feature-rich platform for home automation

Cons

Can be complex for beginners

Limited native mobile app support

Fragmented documentation

Relies on community for support


FHEM

FHEM

FHEM is an open source home automation software written in Perl that allows users to automate various devices and tasks in their home. It can control lighting, heating, security systems, sensors, and more. FHEM runs on Linux and other Unix-based systems.

Categories:
automation lighting-control heating-control security sensors

FHEM Features

  1. Controls and monitors a wide range of devices like lights, thermostats, sensors, security systems, etc
  2. Supports many communication protocols like Z-Wave, EnOcean, MQTT, HTTP, etc
  3. Highly customizable through plugins and scripts
  4. Web interface for remote access and control
  5. Rules engine for automation based on events and conditions
  6. Notifications through email, Telegram, etc
  7. Data logging and graphs
  8. Voice control integration (Alexa, Google Assistant)
  9. OpenHAB and Home Assistant integration

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Very flexible and extensible

Supports many devices and protocols

Active community support

Self-hosted, not dependent on cloud services

Cons

Steep learning curve

Setup and configuration can be complex

CLI-focused, lacks polished UI

Requires Linux server to run

Limited smartphone apps