IPScan32 vs Fing

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

IPScan32 icon
IPScan32
Fing icon
Fing

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between IPScan32 and Fing? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

IPScan32 is a Network & Admin solution with tags like network-mapping, asset-discovery, port-scanning.

It boasts features such as IP and MAC address scanning, Port scanning, Network mapping, Asset discovery, Command line interface, Export scanning results and pros including Free and open source, Easy to use graphical interface, Fast and efficient scanning, Cross-platform (Windows, Linux, Mac), Powerful scanning and reporting capabilities.

On the other hand, Fing is a Network & Admin product tagged with network, scanner, troubleshooting, security, audit.

Its standout features include Network scanning, Device identification, Port scanning, Network diagnostics, Network security auditing, and it shines with pros like Free and easy to use, Provides detailed network visibility, Available on multiple platforms, Can export scan results.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare IPScan32 and Fing?

When evaluating IPScan32 versus Fing, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

IPScan32 and Fing have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include network-mapping, asset-discovery, port-scanning.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between IPScan32 and Fing significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include network-mapping, asset-discovery, port-scanning.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include network-mapping, asset-discovery and network, scanner.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between IPScan32 and Fing. You might also explore network-mapping, asset-discovery, port-scanning for alternative approaches.

Feature IPScan32 Fing
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

IPScan32
IPScan32

Description: IPScan32 is an open-source network scanner useful for network mapping and asset discovery. It scans IP addresses and ports to determine which devices and services are running on the network.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Fing
Fing

Description: Fing is a free network scanning app for iOS and Android devices. It provides information about all devices connected to your WiFi network, such as IP addresses, MAC addresses, device names, vendors, and open ports. Fing is useful for network troubleshooting, security audits, and general network visibility.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

IPScan32
IPScan32 Features
  • IP and MAC address scanning
  • Port scanning
  • Network mapping
  • Asset discovery
  • Command line interface
  • Export scanning results
Fing
Fing Features
  • Network scanning
  • Device identification
  • Port scanning
  • Network diagnostics
  • Network security auditing

Pros & Cons Analysis

IPScan32
IPScan32
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use graphical interface
  • Fast and efficient scanning
  • Cross-platform (Windows, Linux, Mac)
  • Powerful scanning and reporting capabilities
Cons
  • Limited reporting compared to commercial tools
  • No centralized management features
  • Requires some technical knowledge to use advanced features
Fing
Fing
Pros
  • Free and easy to use
  • Provides detailed network visibility
  • Available on multiple platforms
  • Can export scan results
Cons
  • Limited functionality in free version
  • Requires excessive permissions
  • Contains ads in free version

Pricing Comparison

IPScan32
IPScan32
  • Open Source
Fing
Fing
  • Freemium

Get More Information

IPScan32
IPScan32
IPScan32
Learn More About IPScan32
Fing
Fing
Fing
Learn More About Fing

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Find your fit.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal