Jasmine vs Protractor

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Jasmine icon
Jasmine
Protractor icon
Protractor

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Jasmine and Protractor? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Jasmine is a Development solution with tags like javascript, testing, behavior-driven-development, unit-testing.

It boasts features such as Behavior-driven development framework, Supports TDD, BDD styles, DOM manipulation support, Spying on JavaScript functions, Asynchronous testing support, Mocking AJAX requests and responses, Jasmine spec runner to execute tests and pros including Easy to learn syntax, Active community support, Integrates well with other JS frameworks, Open source and free to use.

On the other hand, Protractor is a Development product tagged with endtoend-testing, angular, javascript.

Its standout features include Supports Angular and AngularJS applications, Runs tests against application in real browser, Interacts with application like an actual user, Uses Jasmine framework for writing tests, Integrates with Selenium WebDriver, Provides automatic waiting and synchronization, Supports Page Object Model, and it shines with pros like Easy to set up and get started, Open source and free to use, Active community support, Supports multiple browsers, Helps write stable and reliable UI tests.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Jasmine and Protractor?

When evaluating Jasmine versus Protractor, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Jasmine and Protractor have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include javascript, testing, behavior-driven-development.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Jasmine and Protractor significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include javascript, testing, behavior-driven-development, unit-testing.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include javascript, testing and endtoend-testing, angular.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Jasmine and Protractor. You might also explore javascript, testing, behavior-driven-development for alternative approaches.

Feature Jasmine Protractor
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Jasmine
Jasmine

Description: Jasmine is an open-source behavior-driven development framework for JavaScript that provides the necessary functions to write and execute unit tests for client-side JavaScript code. It aims to provide a clean syntax to help write tests that are easy to read and understand.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Protractor
Protractor

Description: Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. It runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Jasmine
Jasmine Features
  • Behavior-driven development framework
  • Supports TDD, BDD styles
  • DOM manipulation support
  • Spying on JavaScript functions
  • Asynchronous testing support
  • Mocking AJAX requests and responses
  • Jasmine spec runner to execute tests
Protractor
Protractor Features
  • Supports Angular and AngularJS applications
  • Runs tests against application in real browser
  • Interacts with application like an actual user
  • Uses Jasmine framework for writing tests
  • Integrates with Selenium WebDriver
  • Provides automatic waiting and synchronization
  • Supports Page Object Model

Pros & Cons Analysis

Jasmine
Jasmine
Pros
  • Easy to learn syntax
  • Active community support
  • Integrates well with other JS frameworks
  • Open source and free to use
Cons
  • Limited reporting compared to other frameworks
  • No browser automation
  • Not ideal for end-to-end or integration testing
Protractor
Protractor
Pros
  • Easy to set up and get started
  • Open source and free to use
  • Active community support
  • Supports multiple browsers
  • Helps write stable and reliable UI tests
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Only works with Angular apps
  • Difficult to debug failures
  • Brittle locators can cause flaky tests

Pricing Comparison

Jasmine
Jasmine
  • Open Source
  • Free
Protractor
Protractor
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs