jquery-template vs Dust.js

Struggling to choose between jquery-template and Dust.js? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

jquery-template is a Development solution with tags like templating, jquery, html.

It boasts features such as Client-side templating, Minimal syntax, Uses jQuery selectors for data binding, Support for conditional logic and loops, Easy integration with jQuery and pros including Lightweight and fast, Simplifies building dynamic UI, Good for small to medium complexity templates, Integrates seamlessly with jQuery, Active development and support.

On the other hand, Dust.js is a Development product tagged with templating, clientside, serverside.

Its standout features include Template inheritance, Automatic escaping for security, Asynchronous rendering, Streaming, Client-side and server-side rendering, Partial templates, Conditionals and loops, Helpers for formatting, Extensible with custom helpers and filters, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Secure against XSS attacks, Good documentation, Active community support, Integration with Express.js for server-side rendering, Streaming allows progressive rendering.

Feature	jquery-template	Dust.js
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

jquery-template

Description: jQuery Template is a lightweight JavaScript templating engine that allows you to build HTML templates with minimal syntax. It uses jQuery selectors to bind data and provides features like conditional logic and loops for dynamic templating.

Dust.js

Description: Dust.js is a lightweight JavaScript templating library for both client-side and server-side rendering. It has a simple, easy-to-read syntax and aims to provide complete control of HTML output while being highly extensible.

Key Features Comparison

jquery-template Features

• Client-side templating
• Minimal syntax
• Uses jQuery selectors for data binding
• Support for conditional logic and loops
• Easy integration with jQuery

Dust.js Features

• Template inheritance
• Automatic escaping for security
• Asynchronous rendering
• Streaming
• Client-side and server-side rendering
• Partial templates
• Conditionals and loops
• Helpers for formatting
• Extensible with custom helpers and filters

Pros & Cons Analysis

jquery-template

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Simplifies building dynamic UI
• Good for small to medium complexity templates
• Integrates seamlessly with jQuery
• Active development and support

Cons

• Limited features compared to full-blown frameworks
• Not ideal for large complex templates
• Limited documentation and examples
• No two-way data binding

Dust.js

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Secure against XSS attacks
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Integration with Express.js for server-side rendering
• Streaming allows progressive rendering

Cons

• Less flexible compared to some other templating engines
• Limited adoption outside of LinkedIn where it originated
• Requires learning non-standard syntax

Pricing Comparison

jquery-template

• Open Source
• Free

Dust.js

• Open Source