KCFinder vs Roxy Fileman

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

KCFinder icon
KCFinder
Roxy Fileman icon
Roxy Fileman

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between KCFinder and Roxy Fileman? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

KCFinder is a Development solution with tags like file-manager, file-uploader, web-interface.

It boasts features such as File browser, Image resizing, File upload, Integration with CKEditor and TinyMCE, User access control, Multiple language support and pros including Open source, Easy to integrate, Good documentation, Active community support, Lightweight and fast.

On the other hand, Roxy Fileman is a File Management product tagged with file-manager, web-interface, multilanguage, file-uploaddownload, search, archive-support, image-preview, image-editing.

Its standout features include Multi-language interface, File upload/download, Search files, Archive support, Image preview, Image editing, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use web interface, Good functionality for basic file management, Works on most web servers, Supports multiple languages.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare KCFinder and Roxy Fileman?

When evaluating KCFinder versus Roxy Fileman, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

KCFinder and Roxy Fileman have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include file-manager, file-uploader, web-interface.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between KCFinder and Roxy Fileman significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include file-manager, file-uploader, web-interface.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include file-manager, file-uploader and file-manager, web-interface.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between KCFinder and Roxy Fileman. You might also explore file-manager, file-uploader, web-interface for alternative approaches.

Feature KCFinder Roxy Fileman
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development File Management
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

KCFinder
KCFinder

Description: KCFinder is an open source file manager and file uploader for web applications. It allows managing files and uploading files to a server from a web interface. Useful for adding file upload capabilities to websites and web apps.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman

Description: Roxy Fileman is a free and open-source file manager for web servers. It allows managing files and folders on a server through a web interface. Key features include a multi-language interface, file upload/download, search, archive support, image preview and editing.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

KCFinder
KCFinder Features
  • File browser
  • Image resizing
  • File upload
  • Integration with CKEditor and TinyMCE
  • User access control
  • Multiple language support
Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman Features
  • Multi-language interface
  • File upload/download
  • Search files
  • Archive support
  • Image preview
  • Image editing

Pros & Cons Analysis

KCFinder
KCFinder
Pros
  • Open source
  • Easy to integrate
  • Good documentation
  • Active community support
  • Lightweight and fast
Cons
  • Limited features compared to proprietary options
  • Setup can be complex for beginners
  • No official paid support options
  • Lacks some enterprise-level features
Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use web interface
  • Good functionality for basic file management
  • Works on most web servers
  • Supports multiple languages
Cons
  • Lacks some advanced features of desktop file managers
  • Setup can be tricky for beginners
  • Security needs to be handled carefully
  • No official support offered

Pricing Comparison

KCFinder
KCFinder
  • Open Source
Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman
  • Free
  • Open Source

Get More Information

KCFinder
KCFinder
KCFinder
Learn More About KCFinder
Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman
Roxy Fileman
Learn More About Roxy Fileman

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Smarter picks. Fewer clicks.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal