Keycloak vs Microsoft Entra ID

Struggling to choose between Keycloak and Microsoft Entra ID? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Keycloak is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like authentication, authorization, user-management, open-source.

It boasts features such as Single sign-on, Identity brokering and social login, User federation, Client adapters, Admin console and pros including Open source, Easy integration, Flexible and customizable, Robust access management capabilities.

On the other hand, Microsoft Entra ID is a Security & Privacy product tagged with single-signon, multifactor-authentication, selfservice-password-reset, active-directory, office-365.

Its standout features include Single sign-on, Multi-factor authentication, Self-service password reset, Role-based access control, Adaptive authentication, Integration with Active Directory and Office 365, and it shines with pros like Enhanced security, Increased productivity, Reduced IT costs, Simplified access management, Seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystem.

Feature	Keycloak	Microsoft Entra ID
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

Keycloak

Description: Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It handles authentication, authorization, and user federation and makes it easy to secure applications and services. Keycloak provides out-of-the-box support for popular protocols like OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0.

Microsoft Entra ID

Description: Microsoft Entra ID is an identity and access management (IAM) solution that provides single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, self-service password reset, and more. It integrates with Active Directory and Office 365 to manage identities and access.

Key Features Comparison

Keycloak Features

• Single sign-on
• Identity brokering and social login
• User federation
• Client adapters
• Admin console

Microsoft Entra ID Features

• Single sign-on
• Multi-factor authentication
• Self-service password reset
• Role-based access control
• Adaptive authentication
• Integration with Active Directory and Office 365

Pros & Cons Analysis

Keycloak

Pros

• Open source
• Easy integration
• Flexible and customizable
• Robust access management capabilities

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Complex configuration
• Limited native reporting capabilities

Microsoft Entra ID

Pros

• Enhanced security
• Increased productivity
• Reduced IT costs
• Simplified access management
• Seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystem

Cons

• Complex setup and configuration
• Steep learning curve
• Can be expensive for smaller businesses
• Limited customization options

Pricing Comparison

Keycloak

• Open Source

Microsoft Entra ID

• Subscription-Based