Lantern vs strongSwan

Struggling to choose between Lantern and strongSwan? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Lantern is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like proxy, censorship-bypass, internet-freedom.

It boasts features such as Bypasses internet censorship, Allows access to blocked websites, Uses peer-to-peer network to route traffic, Avoids surveillance, Open source code and pros including Circumvents censorship, Provides access to restricted content, Uses decentralized network, Enhances privacy.

On the other hand, strongSwan is a Security & Privacy product tagged with encryption, authentication, network-access-control, ipsec, ikev1, ikev2.

Its standout features include IKEv1 and IKEv2 key exchange protocols, IPsec-based VPN, Encryption and authentication, Network access control, Interoperability with other IPsec VPN solutions, and it shines with pros like Open source, Supports major Linux distributions, Highly configurable, Supports IKEv2 mobility, Regular security updates.

Feature	Lantern	strongSwan
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

Lantern

Description: Lantern is an open source web proxy software that allows users to bypass internet censorship and access blocked websites. It uses a peer-to-peer network to route internet traffic through multiple servers, avoiding censorship and surveillance.

strongSwan

Description: strongSwan is an open-source IPsec-based VPN software for Linux. It implements IKEv1 and IKEv2 key exchange protocols and can interoperate with other IPsec VPN solutions. It offers encryption, authentication, and network access control for securing communications over public networks.

Key Features Comparison

Lantern Features

• Bypasses internet censorship
• Allows access to blocked websites
• Uses peer-to-peer network to route traffic
• Avoids surveillance
• Open source code

strongSwan Features

• IKEv1 and IKEv2 key exchange protocols
• IPsec-based VPN
• Encryption and authentication
• Network access control
• Interoperability with other IPsec VPN solutions

Pros & Cons Analysis

Lantern

Pros

• Circumvents censorship
• Provides access to restricted content
• Uses decentralized network
• Enhances privacy

Cons

• May be illegal in some regions
• Can be blocked by authorities
• Requires technical knowledge to setup
• Speed may vary

strongSwan

Pros

• Open source
• Supports major Linux distributions
• Highly configurable
• Supports IKEv2 mobility
• Regular security updates

Cons

• Complex configuration
• Limited user-friendly interfaces
• Steep learning curve
• Lacks support for some Windows versions

Pricing Comparison

Lantern

• Open Source

strongSwan

• Open Source