Last.Backend vs Heroku

Struggling to choose between Last.Backend and Heroku? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Last.Backend is a Development solution with tags like container, kubernetes, microservices, devops.

It boasts features such as Automated cluster management, Service discovery and load balancing, Resource scheduling and optimization, Secret management, Built-in monitoring and logging, CLI and UI for managing applications, Support for Kubernetes concepts like Deployments, Services, etc, Horizontal autoscaling of applications, Can deploy to multiple cloud providers and on-prem clusters and pros including Open source and free to use, Automates infrastructure management, Makes deploying apps simpler, Good for microservices architectures, Active development community.

On the other hand, Heroku is a Online Services product tagged with paas, cloud-computing, application-deployment.

Its standout features include Cloud platform as a service, Simplifies deployment, management and scaling, Supports popular languages like Ruby, Java, Node.js, Scala, Clojure, Python and PHP, Add-ons provide additional services like databases, monitoring, logging, etc, Git-based workflow for deploying code changes, Free starter tier available, and it shines with pros like Easy and fast deployment, Automatic scaling, Focus on writing code without infrastructure management, Reliable and secure platform, Integrates with other Salesforce products, Large ecosystem of add-ons.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Last.Backend

Last.Backend

Last.Backend is an open-source platform as a service (PaaS) that makes it easier to deploy, scale, and manage containerized applications. It handles cluster management, resource scheduling, service discovery, load balancing, secret management, and more.

Categories:
Development Container Management
container kubernetes microservices devops

Last.Backend Features

  1. Automated cluster management
  2. Service discovery and load balancing
  3. Resource scheduling and optimization
  4. Secret management
  5. Built-in monitoring and logging
  6. CLI and UI for managing applications
  7. Support for Kubernetes concepts like Deployments, Services, etc
  8. Horizontal autoscaling of applications
  9. Can deploy to multiple cloud providers and on-prem clusters

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free to use

Automates infrastructure management

Makes deploying apps simpler

Good for microservices architectures

Active development community

Cons

Less features than some proprietary PaaS offerings

Not as mature or widely adopted as alternatives

Limited to containers, unlike some PaaS that support multiple runtimes

Steeper learning curve than basic PaaS

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud platform as a service (PaaS) that simplifies application deployment, management, and scaling. Acquired by Salesforce, Heroku allows developers to focus on writing code by providing an easy-to-use platform for building, deploying, and scaling applications without the need for complex infrastructure management.

Categories:
Online Services Cloud Platform
paas cloud-computing application-deployment

Heroku Features

  1. Cloud platform as a service
  2. Simplifies deployment, management and scaling
  3. Supports popular languages like Ruby, Java, Node.js, Scala, Clojure, Python and PHP
  4. Add-ons provide additional services like databases, monitoring, logging, etc
  5. Git-based workflow for deploying code changes
  6. Free starter tier available

Pricing

  • Free
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Easy and fast deployment

Automatic scaling

Focus on writing code without infrastructure management

Reliable and secure platform

Integrates with other Salesforce products

Large ecosystem of add-ons

Cons

Can get expensive for large scale applications

Limited control compared to IaaS

Vendor lock-in

Config changes require redeploy

Not ideal for complex applications