LibreNMS vs Cacti

Struggling to choose between LibreNMS and Cacti? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

LibreNMS is a Network & Admin solution with tags like open-source, network-monitoring, autodiscovery, hardware-support.

It boasts features such as Auto-discovery of devices on the network, Monitoring of network devices like servers, switches, routers, etc, Monitoring via SNMP, which is supported by most network devices, Wide range of supported hardware platforms and operating systems, Intuitive web interface for monitoring and managing devices, Alerting and notification system, Graphing and reporting capabilities, Extendable via plugins and scripts, REST API for integration with other systems and pros including Free and open source, Easy to install and configure, Scales to monitor large networks, Large community support, Very customizable and extendable, Supports a wide variety of devices, Good documentation.

On the other hand, Cacti is a Network & Admin product tagged with network, monitoring, graphing, statistics.

Its standout features include Graphing and monitoring tool for network devices, Supports SNMP polling for data collection, Customizable graphs and dashboards, Threshold-based alerting, Supports RRDTool for data storage, Web-based interface, Plugin architecture for extendibility, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to install and configure, Wide range of supported devices, Flexible and customizable, Active community support.

Feature	LibreNMS	Cacti
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

LibreNMS

Description: LibreNMS is an open source network monitoring system that provides monitoring of servers, switches, printers and other network devices. It has auto-discovery to detect devices on the network and includes support for a wide range of hardware platforms.

Cacti

Description: Cacti is an open-source network monitoring and graphing tool that provides easy monitoring of network devices and servers. It polls devices for utilization data, stores the data, and generates graphs and statistics to help analyze network traffic and utilization.

Key Features Comparison

LibreNMS Features

• Auto-discovery of devices on the network
• Monitoring of network devices like servers, switches, routers, etc
• Monitoring via SNMP, which is supported by most network devices
• Wide range of supported hardware platforms and operating systems
• Intuitive web interface for monitoring and managing devices
• Alerting and notification system
• Graphing and reporting capabilities
• Extendable via plugins and scripts
• REST API for integration with other systems

Cacti Features

• Graphing and monitoring tool for network devices
• Supports SNMP polling for data collection
• Customizable graphs and dashboards
• Threshold-based alerting
• Supports RRDTool for data storage
• Web-based interface
• Plugin architecture for extendibility

Pros & Cons Analysis

LibreNMS

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to install and configure
• Scales to monitor large networks
• Large community support
• Very customizable and extendable
• Supports a wide variety of devices
• Good documentation

Cons

• Can be resource intensive for very large networks
• Limited native support for monitoring non-network devices
• Steeper learning curve than some other tools
• Developed features may lag behind proprietary tools

Cacti

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to install and configure
• Wide range of supported devices
• Flexible and customizable
• Active community support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Complex interface
• Manual configuration required
• Limited scalability
• No official support

Pricing Comparison

LibreNMS

• Open Source

Cacti

• Open Source