LibreSSL vs wolfSSL

Struggling to choose between LibreSSL and wolfSSL? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

LibreSSL is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like encryption, ssltls, cryptography, security.

It boasts features such as Fork of OpenSSL created in response to Heartbleed vulnerability, Focused on modernizing the codebase and improving security, Removes unused legacy code and features from OpenSSL, Simplified build system and configuration, Supports TLS, SSL, cryptography and X.509 certificates like OpenSSL and pros including Improved security and code quality over OpenSSL, Regular security audits and fuzz testing, More active development than OpenSSL, Removes obsolete platforms and features, Smaller codebase that is easier to maintain, Compatible API with OpenSSL.

On the other hand, wolfSSL is a Security & Privacy product tagged with ssl, tls, cryptography, encryption, security.

Its standout features include Lightweight SSL/TLS implementation, Supports common cipher suites like AES, RSA, ECC, SHA2, etc, Works across platforms like embedded systems, desktops, mobile, Provides encryption, authentication, and certificate management, Integration with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache, Support for TLS 1.3 and other latest protocols, Written in C for better performance and small footprint, Support for session resumption and caching for efficiency, Can be used with or without an OS layer, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast performance, Small code footprint suitable for embedded use, Portable across many platforms and architectures, Open source and free to use, Supports latest TLS versions and cipher suites, Easy to integrate and use in existing apps, Good for constrained environments like IoT, Customizable build options.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

LibreSSL

LibreSSL

LibreSSL is a free and open source cryptographic software library, forked from OpenSSL in 2014 after the Heartbleed vulnerability was disclosed. It aims to be a modern, efficient, and secure replacement for OpenSSL.

Categories:
encryption ssltls cryptography security

LibreSSL Features

  1. Fork of OpenSSL created in response to Heartbleed vulnerability
  2. Focused on modernizing the codebase and improving security
  3. Removes unused legacy code and features from OpenSSL
  4. Simplified build system and configuration
  5. Supports TLS, SSL, cryptography and X.509 certificates like OpenSSL

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Improved security and code quality over OpenSSL

Regular security audits and fuzz testing

More active development than OpenSSL

Removes obsolete platforms and features

Smaller codebase that is easier to maintain

Compatible API with OpenSSL

Cons

Lacks some enterprise features of OpenSSL

Fewer protocol options than OpenSSL

Less widely deployed than OpenSSL currently

Limited Windows support

Smaller developer community than OpenSSL


wolfSSL

wolfSSL

wolfSSL is an open source SSL/TLS library that is lightweight, portable, and provides encryption and authentication for applications. It supports common cipher suites and protocols, and has a small code footprint suitable for embedded systems.

Categories:
ssl tls cryptography encryption security

WolfSSL Features

  1. Lightweight SSL/TLS implementation
  2. Supports common cipher suites like AES, RSA, ECC, SHA2, etc
  3. Works across platforms like embedded systems, desktops, mobile
  4. Provides encryption, authentication, and certificate management
  5. Integration with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache
  6. Support for TLS 1.3 and other latest protocols
  7. Written in C for better performance and small footprint
  8. Support for session resumption and caching for efficiency
  9. Can be used with or without an OS layer

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Lightweight and fast performance

Small code footprint suitable for embedded use

Portable across many platforms and architectures

Open source and free to use

Supports latest TLS versions and cipher suites

Easy to integrate and use in existing apps

Good for constrained environments like IoT

Customizable build options

Cons

Lacks some advanced TLS features compared to OpenSSL

Limited support for older platforms and compilers

Smaller community than more popular SSL libraries

Not as extensively battle-tested as older options

Lacks bindings for some languages