Lighttpd vs Tntnet

Struggling to choose between Lighttpd and Tntnet? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Lighttpd is a Network & Admin solution with tags like web-server, lightweight, open-source, high-performance, reverse-proxy.

It boasts features such as Lightweight and optimized for speed, Low memory footprint, Supports HTTP/1.1, FastCGI, SCGI, CGI, Built-in SSL/TLS support, Supports virtual hosting, Modular architecture with plugins, Load balancing and proxy capabilities and pros including Very fast and efficient, Low resource usage, Highly scalable, Stable and secure, Easy configuration, Extensible via modules.

On the other hand, Tntnet is a Development product tagged with c, web-server, high-performance.

Its standout features include Lightweight and fast, Built in C++ for performance, Non-blocking I/O model, Supports HTTP 1.1, SSL/TLS support, CGI, FastCGI, SCGI support, Websockets support, URL rewriting, Template engine, Access logging, IPv6 support, and it shines with pros like Very fast and lightweight, Low memory usage, Good performance for static content, Integrates well with other C++ apps, Active development community.

Feature	Lighttpd	Tntnet
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Development

Product Overview

Lighttpd

Description: Lighttpd, often referred to as Lighty, is an open-source and lightweight web server known for its speed, efficiency, and low resource consumption. Designed with a focus on performance and flexibility, lighttpd is suitable for serving static and dynamic content, acting as a reverse proxy, and handling high-traffic websites.

Tntnet

Description: Tntnet is an open-source web application server written in C++. It is lightweight, fast, and provides an alternative to other servers like Apache or Nginx for serving web applications. Tntnet focuses on high performance and small resource usage.

Key Features Comparison

Lighttpd Features

• Lightweight and optimized for speed
• Low memory footprint
• Supports HTTP/1.1, FastCGI, SCGI, CGI
• Built-in SSL/TLS support
• Supports virtual hosting
• Modular architecture with plugins
• Load balancing and proxy capabilities

Tntnet Features

• Lightweight and fast
• Built in C++ for performance
• Non-blocking I/O model
• Supports HTTP 1.1
• SSL/TLS support
• CGI, FastCGI, SCGI support
• Websockets support
• URL rewriting
• Template engine
• Access logging
• IPv6 support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Lighttpd

Pros

• Very fast and efficient
• Low resource usage
• Highly scalable
• Stable and secure
• Easy configuration
• Extensible via modules

Cons

• Limited built-in features
• Less flexible configuration than Apache
• Smaller community than other web servers
• Limited documentation and support resources

Tntnet

Pros

• Very fast and lightweight
• Low memory usage
• Good performance for static content
• Integrates well with other C++ apps
• Active development community

Cons

• Less flexible compared to scripting based servers
• Less plugins/modules available
• Steeper learning curve than other servers
• Not as well known or used as alternatives

Pricing Comparison

Lighttpd

• Open Source

Tntnet

• Open Source