Loadrunner vs LoadForge

Struggling to choose between Loadrunner and LoadForge? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Loadrunner is a Development solution with tags like load-testing, performance-monitoring, concurrency-simulation.

It boasts features such as Load and performance testing, Web services testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Database load testing, Network bandwidth simulation, Integrates with CI/CD pipelines and pros including Comprehensive load testing capabilities, Scalable to simulate thousands of concurrent users, Integrates with many monitoring and analytics tools, Can test a wide variety of applications and protocols, Mature product with wide adoption.

On the other hand, LoadForge is a Development product tagged with load-testing, performance-testing, open-source.

Its standout features include Record and replay scripts to simulate user interactions, Generate high load for stress testing using concurrent virtual users, Built-in support for common protocols like HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, etc, Command-line interface and XML-based scripting language, Detailed request metrics and customizable HTML reporting, Distributed load generation using agent-based architecture, Plugin support for extensibility and custom protocols, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Lightweight and easy to install, Good for functional and load testing web apps, Active community support and development.

Feature	Loadrunner	LoadForge
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Loadrunner

Description: Loadrunner is a performance testing and monitoring software that is used to test and analyze software applications. It allows you to simulate thousands of users concurrently accessing an application, generate realistic workloads, and identify performance issues.

LoadForge

Description: LoadForge is an open-source load and performance testing tool for web applications. It allows users to simulate large numbers of concurrent users and heavy workloads to test the scalability and reliability of a system under load.

Key Features Comparison

Loadrunner Features

• Load and performance testing
• Web services testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Database load testing
• Network bandwidth simulation
• Integrates with CI/CD pipelines

LoadForge Features

• Record and replay scripts to simulate user interactions
• Generate high load for stress testing using concurrent virtual users
• Built-in support for common protocols like HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, etc
• Command-line interface and XML-based scripting language
• Detailed request metrics and customizable HTML reporting
• Distributed load generation using agent-based architecture
• Plugin support for extensibility and custom protocols

Pros & Cons Analysis

Loadrunner

Pros

• Comprehensive load testing capabilities
• Scalable to simulate thousands of concurrent users
• Integrates with many monitoring and analytics tools
• Can test a wide variety of applications and protocols
• Mature product with wide adoption

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Scripting and test creation can be complex
• Limited support for latest web technologies
• Expensive licensing model
• Requires add-ons for full functionality

LoadForge

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Lightweight and easy to install
• Good for functional and load testing web apps
• Active community support and development

Cons

• Limited built-in support for modern web technologies
• Scripting requires technical expertise
• Not as feature rich as commercial tools

Pricing Comparison

Loadrunner

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

LoadForge

• Open Source
• Free