lsyncd vs SyncBack

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

lsyncd icon
lsyncd
SyncBack icon
SyncBack

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between lsyncd and SyncBack? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

lsyncd is a Backup & Sync solution with tags like rsync, mirroring, replication.

It boasts features such as Real-time mirroring of local directories to remote targets, Configurable one or two way sync, Support for rsync, SSH, and other protocols, Event-driven monitoring and syncing, Exclude filters for fine-grained control, Daemonized process for background syncing and pros including Lightweight and efficient, Easy to configure, Great for keeping remote servers in sync, More reliable than cron+rsync scripts, Open source with active development.

On the other hand, SyncBack is a Backup & Sync product tagged with backup, sync, file, folder, incremental, compression.

Its standout features include Real-time sync, Backup versioning, Compression & encryption, File filters, Scheduling, Error handling, Notifications, Cloud support (OneDrive, Dropbox, etc), Portable & silent modes, Command line interface, Extensive logging, Unicode & 64-bit support, and it shines with pros like Easy to use interface, Very customizable, Wide platform & storage support, Incremental backups to save space, Open source version available, Active development & support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare lsyncd and SyncBack?

When evaluating lsyncd versus SyncBack, both solutions serve different needs within the backup & sync ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

lsyncd and SyncBack have established themselves in the backup & sync market. Key areas include rsync, mirroring, replication.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between lsyncd and SyncBack significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include rsync, mirroring, replication.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include rsync, mirroring and backup, sync.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between lsyncd and SyncBack. You might also explore rsync, mirroring, replication for alternative approaches.

Feature lsyncd SyncBack
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Backup & Sync Backup & Sync
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

lsyncd
lsyncd

Description: lsyncd is a utility that synchronizes local directories with remote targets using rsync. It aims to provide a simple way to frequently and efficiently mirror local directories across many servers.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

SyncBack
SyncBack

Description: SyncBack is a backup and file synchronization program for Windows. It allows users to easily backup, synchronize, and restore files and folders locally, over networks, and to the cloud. It supports incremental backups and various compression methods for efficient storage.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

lsyncd
lsyncd Features
  • Real-time mirroring of local directories to remote targets
  • Configurable one or two way sync
  • Support for rsync, SSH, and other protocols
  • Event-driven monitoring and syncing
  • Exclude filters for fine-grained control
  • Daemonized process for background syncing
SyncBack
SyncBack Features
  • Real-time sync
  • Backup versioning
  • Compression & encryption
  • File filters
  • Scheduling
  • Error handling
  • Notifications
  • Cloud support (OneDrive, Dropbox, etc)
  • Portable & silent modes
  • Command line interface
  • Extensive logging
  • Unicode & 64-bit support

Pros & Cons Analysis

lsyncd
lsyncd
Pros
  • Lightweight and efficient
  • Easy to configure
  • Great for keeping remote servers in sync
  • More reliable than cron+rsync scripts
  • Open source with active development
Cons
  • Less features than commercial alternatives
  • Steeper learning curve than GUI tools
  • Requires familiarity with rsync
  • No built-in GUI
SyncBack
SyncBack
Pros
  • Easy to use interface
  • Very customizable
  • Wide platform & storage support
  • Incremental backups to save space
  • Open source version available
  • Active development & support
Cons
  • Can be resource intensive
  • Initial setup not intuitive
  • Pro version expensive

Pricing Comparison

lsyncd
lsyncd
  • Open Source
SyncBack
SyncBack
  • Freemium
  • One-time Purchase
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs