ltrace vs Process Monitor

Struggling to choose between ltrace and Process Monitor? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ltrace is a Development solution with tags like library, debugging, tracing, dynamic-linking.

It boasts features such as Intercepts and records dynamic library calls made by a process, Can trace calls made by programs to shared libraries, Helps debug issues caused by dynamic linking, Shows parameters passed to library functions and return values, Tracks time spent in each call and pros including Lightweight and easy to use for debugging, Does not require modifying or recompiling the target program, Works on most Linux distributions without special setup, Can trace proprietary programs where source code is unavailable.

On the other hand, Process Monitor is a Os & Utilities product tagged with process, monitor, system, utility.

Its standout features include Real-time monitoring of file system, Registry, process, thread and network activity, Filter and search capabilities to focus on events of interest, Detailed information on event properties, Save log files to analyze events offline, Integration with other Sysinternals tools, and it shines with pros like Powerful troubleshooting capabilities, Helps identify root causes of system issues, Lightweight and low resource usage, Free and open source.

Feature	ltrace	Process Monitor
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

ltrace

Description: ltrace is a debugging utility that intercepts and records dynamic library calls which are called by an executed process. It can be used to trace calls made by programs to shared libraries and helps debug issues caused by dynamic linking.

Process Monitor

Description: Process Monitor is a advanced monitoring tool for Windows that shows real-time file system, Registry and process/thread activity. It can help identify application conflicts, malware, and performance issues.

Key Features Comparison

ltrace Features

• Intercepts and records dynamic library calls made by a process
• Can trace calls made by programs to shared libraries
• Helps debug issues caused by dynamic linking
• Shows parameters passed to library functions and return values
• Tracks time spent in each call

Process Monitor Features

• Real-time monitoring of file system, Registry, process, thread and network activity
• Filter and search capabilities to focus on events of interest
• Detailed information on event properties
• Save log files to analyze events offline
• Integration with other Sysinternals tools

Pros & Cons Analysis

ltrace

Pros

• Lightweight and easy to use for debugging
• Does not require modifying or recompiling the target program
• Works on most Linux distributions without special setup
• Can trace proprietary programs where source code is unavailable

Cons

• Only works for dynamic library calls, not static linking
• Can introduce some runtime overhead when tracing
• Does not trace code within libraries themselves
• Limited Windows support compared to Linux

Process Monitor

Pros

• Powerful troubleshooting capabilities
• Helps identify root causes of system issues
• Lightweight and low resource usage
• Free and open source

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Can generate large log files
• Requires technical expertise to utilize fully

Pricing Comparison

ltrace

• Open Source

Process Monitor

• Free
• Open Source